Articles Archive - Page 221 of 269

Nordost Odin 2 cables

There are other cable systems that cost more than Nordost’s Odin, but none of these rivals seem to draw as much fire from the sceptics and cynics. Odin is the most visible high-priced cable system in audio, and now Nordost’s new Odin 2 raises the bar… and the price. I can almost hear the sound of pitchforks being sharpened and torches being lit.

Odin 2 was possibly the worst kept, most blindingly obvious secret in audio. Nordost has been systematically improving its lines for several years, starting with Leif and the Norse 2 ranges, and most recently with Valhalla 2 (tested in Hi-Fi+ issue 112). Given that Valhalla 2 improved the performance of Valhalla to a point where the difference between Valhalla 2 and Odin was beginning to blur, the development of an Odin 2 was almost inevitable.

The problem is you don’t just ‘update’ Odin. The original Odin cable system from 2008 already set a high standard of attention to detail and uncompromising focus on getting a signal from source to speaker with the least possible compromise. Where do you go from there? Fortunately, the key to this was the design and development criteria that went into turning Valhalla into V2, blending that with what set the original Odin apart from the first version of Valhalla, and then adding Odin 2’s technological distinctiveness in its own right.

The principle element taken from Valhalla 2 is the HOLO:PLUG terminator for phono, XLR, power, and spade connectors. The HOLO:PLUG is designed to create an optimum interface between cable and component, with precisely aligned 360° low eddy current terminations for each conductor in the relevant cable, a rear termination grounding ring, and sophisticated vibration control. This means that the individual HOLO:PLUG must be designed in tandem with the specific cable, so there are no components shared between a Valhalla 2 phono plug and a Odin 2 phono plug. It also means that building the individual cables is a slow, specialist, and painstaking task. But, the path to perfection is paved with such dedication. The one missing element from the HOLO:PLUG list (at the time of writing ) is a 13A UK plug, and fellow traveller in the Nordost bus Quantum has produced a new fused version of its Qbase with Schuko sockets that will get the job done, thereby limiting the number of Furutech UK 13A sockets. The HOLO:PLUG carbon-fibre IEC socket, together with Schuko and US wall plugs are available in HOLO:PLUG form.

The element taken from Odin was its Dual Monofilament layout, which is also now featured in Valhalla 2. A precision double-helix of Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene-wrapped monofilament cables itself encased in a further layer of FEP, in Odin 2, the individual conductors are formed of a number of silver-plated high-purity solid-core copper strands. The actual thickness and number of individual strands that make up a single Odin 2 conductor vary according to their ultimate purpose, and the composition of a Valhalla 2 conductor for a specific cable may have little in common with the make-up of an Odin 2 conductor in the same situation.

Since Norse 2, and especially after Valhalla 2, Nordost has placed increasing significance on making sure the mechanical properties of a cable are optimised to a degree of precision that borders on the obsessive. In Odin 2, however, it crosses that border and marches on Compulsiville. Odin 2 features what Nordost refers to as TSC, or Total Signal Control. TSC comprises additional shielding and spacing tubes, most easily seen in the black and white tubes separating the paired cable sets on the ‘send’ and ‘return’ conductors. These help create an optimum mechanical positioning for the individual conductors in each cable. The wooden resonance/serial number blocks are retained from the original Odin: the branded name, numbers, and direction indicators are now joined by a metal circle (with the three sets of interlocking triangles that make up the Odin rune) set into one side of each block.

Although Odin 2 should be considered as a complete system because of its gestalt totality, it’s wrong to lump the various cables in Odin 2 together as one. This is because Nordost Odin 2 is not isomorphic. In an isomorphic cable family, the same layout is used to develop the loudspeaker cables, interconnect cables, and power cords. Nordost instead develops a series of different designs that apply specifically to the task in hand, but are calibrated through rigourous listening tests to work together. As a result, the power cord uses 7×14 AWG solid-core wires per conductor, the analogue interconnects use 10×23 AWG wires per conductor, and the loudspeaker cables 26×20 AWG wires per conductor.

While there are also tonearm cables, digital interconnects (no USB as yet, however), and
bi-wire jumpers in the Odin 2 range, we concentrated on the core elements: power, interconnect, and speaker cables. We also went with spade connectors rather than 4mm banana plugs for loudspeakers, because my Wilson Duette S2’s don’t eat bananas. With the exception of a single Furutech 13A plug reaching to the wall, every connection and cable to the speaker terminals was pure, unadulterated Odin 2. We also had identical lengths of Valhalla 2 to compare and contrast, as well as some top-end rivals. Our runs of Odin 2 were fully conditioned with one of Nordost’s VIDAR burn-in conditioners.

Valhalla 2 shifted the goalposts. Although it was priced between Valhalla and Odin, Valhalla 2 came dangerously close to the performance of Odin, and Odin 2 is Nordost’s response. Odin 2 is, to use a touch of British understatement, ‘a bit good’, in that while you listen to V2 and think it’s outstanding in its absence of tonal character, if you compare the cable to Odin 2, Valhalla 2 almost sounds ‘broken’. And given V2 already made most other cables sound arch and similarly ‘broken’, Odin 2 makes it all but impossible to listen to lesser cables, even in the context of cheaper audio equipment.

This is a conceit to reviewing, because putting around £100,000 worth of cable in a £10,000 system is likely only ever going to happen in a reviewer’s listening room, but the odd thing about Odin 2 is it makes such a system appear understandable and logical. The £10,000 system produces a more integrated, coordinated sound as a result of the Odin 2 upgrade, making that system hang together in the way most systems at the price don’t. It also makes the system more receptive to the improvements brought about by Nordost’s Sort Kones, Sort Füt, and other devices with similar intent.

The scale of personal epiphany and re-education that takes place with Odin 2 means I can’t quite bring myself to cancel the idea of that seemingly cable-heavy system out as ‘unrealistic’, because I can envisage someone perfectly content with their system as it stands wanting to bring out the best from it, and ultimately settling on Odin 2 as a logical extension of that process. In reality, someone settling on Odin 2 is extremely likely to be using a system that uses £10,000+ components as a bare minimum, rather than a £10,000 system. But while I understand that intellectually, having spent a considerable amount of time listening to Odin 2, I can’t shake the idea that if that £10,000 system was made up of the devices that went really well together, Nordost’s Finest would just tie that system together better than almost anything else on the market, all other things being equal.

So, precisely what does Nordost Odin 2 do that makes it so exceptional? Nothing. It does nothing to the sound of your system, but it does nothing better than almost every other cable out there. You quickly realise just how active that ‘nothing’ really is, which means mixing your mythos – out go Norse gods and in comes Buddhist metaphysics – and Odin 2 is like a Rinzai Zen monk meditating on ‘Mu’ or ‘nothingness’. The devices in the system are unconstrained by Odin 2 to a point that even cables like Odin and Valhalla 2 are unable to attain.

All this sounds like pretentious nonsense, but spend time with Odin 2 and how its calming ‘absence’ nature influences both the system and the way you interact with that system, and you will understand why this ‘nothingness’ is crucial to good sound. You also might discover how the regular audiophile vocabulary is past its limits when trying to describe Odin 2’s performance thresholds. And ‘performance thresholds’ is possibly the best description of where Nordost Odin 2 exists. Alongside a very select list of rival cables, Odin 2 takes your system to new levels of performance you might not have thought possible: in this respect, it’s like listening to great old recordings played back on top-notch new equipment – you end up asking yourself, “did they know how good this is when they made it?” Odin 2 does that to both music and the equipment upon which that music is played.

Bringing this down to single musical examples seems like a constraint in its own right. Describing Odin 2 in terms of “the soundstage width…” or “Beck sounded like…” seems like defining a camera by its strap or the tree you photographed. More importantly, it seems like breaking down something best experienced as a whole into its component parts, and (staying with Buddhist thought a while longer) the parable of a group of blind men trying to describe an elephant seems relevant here. The whole is comparatively straightforward – “it’s your system, only better” – while the sum of the parts is a complex list of tick-boxes in terms of imagery, detail, dynamics, leading-edge attack, trailing-edge resolution, articulation, solidity, and transparency. All of these things are improved, and improved relative to the system you are using. So a system that throws out a wide soundstage will either deliver an even wider soundstage or a more solid soundstage depending on what your components are doing. You can hear more of the recording, too, but not in a hyper-analytical way (unless your system is designed for such hyper-analysis) and yes, Beck sounds more like you would expect Beck to sound on his pained-yet-brilliant Sea Change album [Geffen]; more broken, more emotional, and more melancholic. I’ve not singled Beck out here; what applies to alt-rock acoustic guitar noodling works just as well with an orchestra in full throat, or a taut small combo playing modal jazz. Most other cables at best ‘tease’ out the musicianship of people at the top of their game playing together, but Odin 2 simply has more in reserve and makes this a natural part of the audio replay process. What strikes you when pulling back from Odin 2 is just how rare and fleeting such honesty and integrity to the recording really is in the cable world.

All the usual audiophile clichés apply, so I’m not even going to spout them. Pick the one you like the best and it fits here. Pick another, and that also applies. And yes, the Hi-Fi+ trope of using a complete cable family works too – I’m trying to consciously avoid using the words ‘coherent’ and ‘loom’ together, but sadly it fits. From the power cord on out, Odin 2 just dresses the system in its Sunday finest, and keeps it there.

In short, Nordost’s Odin 2 doesn’t just push the envelope of how unforced audio can sound through a cable; it breaks the sound barrier. Nordost’s original Odin set high standards for cables, whether viewed individually, or in ideal circumstances taken as a complete system. And Odin 2 takes that to another level. The best that became ‘one of the best’ has just returned to its place at the head of the table. Wow!

Details

Cables as tested:
Nordost Odin 2 Supreme power cord: £13,599/1.5m
Nordost Odin 2 Supreme interconnect cables: £19,999/1.5m RCA pair
Nordost Odin 2 Supreme loudspeaker cables: £43,399/4m terminated pair

Manufactured by: Nordost

URL: www.nordost.com

Distributed in the UK by: Atacama Audio

URL: www.atacama-audio.co.uk

Tel: +44(0)1455 283251

Back to reviews

Burmester BA31 floorstanding loudspeaker

Reviewers sometimes pride themselves on their ‘firsts’. I was the first UK reviewer to review a DVD player and the first to test plasma TV technology, for example. Occasionally, however, these ‘firsts’ are not something to be happy about – and this assay of the BA31 floorstanding loudspeaker will likely be the first review of a Burmester product not seen by Dieter Burmester, who died in mid-August this year.

When someone so strongly associated with a company passes away, there is a tendency for people to think the company dies with that leader. Witness the ‘Apple is lost!’ panic following the death of Steve Jobs. The reality is that a good leader creates a good team; a team that will be defined, but not hide-bound, by the legacy that good leader created, and a company that can and will survive after that leader has gone. In a way, such a pessimistic vision of a company’s outlook is disrespectful to both the good leader and the team they created: Apple didn’t disappear after Jobs died, and neither will Burmester in the years following Dieter’s passing.

Part of the reason Burmester’s future is assured is products like the new BA31, the second device in the company’s new Ambience line of loudspeakers. The term Ambience is more than just marketing speak – at the back of the BA31 (and the original, larger BA71) is a second rear-firing Air Motion Transformer (AMT) folded ribbon tweeter, with a large level control, designed to introduce an extra degree of ambience into the system.

This is a radical departure for Burmester, in more ways than one. For some time, Burmester has been creating a range of smaller, slightly less uncompromising looking loudspeakers; less like the imposing B100 and more like, well, loudspeakers non-Burmester fans might buy. Speakers like the BA31 have one-piece front baffles that don’t have a chrome insert shining back at you, and braced, curved MDF cabinets finished in domestically-chummy veneers and glosses.

Back-mounted AMT tweeter aside, the rest of the design is a two-and-a-half way, with a newly-developed version of the AMT tweeter, coupled with a pair of 170mm GRP-treated paper cone mid-bass units. It sits on a heavy, integrated plinth and four spikes, and there is a large rear-firing port, which comes with foam bungs that are a ‘get out of jail free’ card for close-to-wall locations. Well, almost free… if it’s at all possible, get the loudspeakers at least half a metre from rear and side walls and between 2.5m and 4m apart. The manual is very clear and comprehensive on this: it also has a quaint throwback to past times, because the loudspeakers are not magnetically shielded. This means that anyone still using a cathode-ray tube television needs to keep the loudspeakers at least 50cm from the loudspeakers to prevent magnetic field interaction. Presumably, that will undermine your viewing of upcoming episodes of Beverley Hills 90210, Dynasty, and SeaQuest DSV.

The loudspeaker is a diminutive floorstander by Burmester standards, but is still over a metre tall. However it is claimed to deliver -3dB points at 38Hz and at 45kHz, meaning a flat frequency response from about 40Hz on up, and this is realistic in a medium sized listening room. Moreover, although Burmester is known for its power-house amplifiers, its 87dB efficiency and benign impedance (nominally four ohms) means the BA31 could be driven by products from other brands (we used it very successfully with a Hegel H160 integrated amp, and there was no sense of unbalance or struggle). That being said, the advantage of more power and more current delivery means improved performance and integration at low listening levels, but the H160 was suitably ‘grippy’ to drive the speakers well at high volumes and low.

The rear connection panel is a little confusing, but actually extremely logical. It allows the BA31 to be bi-wired or bi-amped (the manual shows three different methods of bi-amping: ‘vertical’, ‘horizontal’ and dual-mono), but there is twice the number of terminals expected for such an arrangement. In fact, the explanation is simple; the outer WBT connectors are designed specifically for spade connectors, while the inner set are designed for 4mm banana plugs. There are jumpers designed to connect the HF and LF terminal blocks.

Although the ‘ambience’ rear-firing tweeter does what it says it does, and introduces a variable degree of ambience into the room, I think this is selling the BA31’s rear tweeter short. Carefully (and individually) adjusted, these rear tweeters act as universal room insertion devices. You can effectively dial the treble and even the midrange of the loudspeaker ‘into’ the room (sub-200Hz bass still requires its own passive or active treatment… or, if you are an audiophile purist, your own ability to listen past the room). Its benefits are immediately apparent, too. Dial the room in correctly and the soundstage just unfolds out into the room. Burmester itself suggests the speaker develops omni-directional or dipole-like properties of soundstaging and this isn’t far from the truth. Correctly implemented in room, the ambience setting makes the ‘sweet spot’ in the listening position really, really sweet.

This ambience control makes reviewing both easier and more difficult. Easier, because the results one hears in a listening room can be more readily translated to any other listening room, but more difficult because the degree of ambience can be adjusted to taste, making a definitive statement on the loudspeaker’s imaging properties dependent on how you like your dial tweaked. Ultimately, though, the BA31 is a loudspeaker that offers a neat take on creating good, personalised soundstaging in the room.

The BA31 does three very Burmester things very well indeed: it plays good, solid, and powerful bass lines (Dieter was, after all, a bass player), it plays at high levels without a problem (Dieter did, after all, like it loud), and it’s incredibly detailed (Dieter was, after all, an audiophile at heart). Sounds played on the BA31 rise out of a very solid foundation, with instruments rooted in place. Play something deep and powerful – whether that be Peter Hurford playing Bach on a church organ or Leftfield playing synthesisers in a studio – and you can raise merry hell. This also means you get to play menacing music that rarely sees the light of audio show day like ‘IM The Supervisor’ by Infected Mushroom on the BNE label (never, ever drive with this playing unless you like speeding tickets).

Burmester’s BA31 passes the ‘Just a Little Lovin’’ test. Play the Shelby Lynn track, then follow it with Dusty Springfield’s version. Overly audiophile devices will point you in the direction of Lynn because of the recording quality, while more prosaic devices will make Dusty win out because of the integrity of the music. The BA31 showcases what is good about both versions of the track, without grace or favour to either. Similarly, on ‘Constant Craving’ from k d lang’s Ingénue [Sire] album, the overproduced, early 1990s mix is reproduced well, but doesn’t detract from the performance. A lot of audiophile loudspeaker systems accent the vibes on this track, while others just make this a bit of a syrupy mess. The BA31 helps bring out the chorus and the subtleties of the rhythm section in this softly-rolling – but deceptively ‘tight’ – country vibe.

Jazz and Classical are the speaker’s happy places, though. ‘Duke’s Mixture’ from Donald Byrd’s The Cat Walk (audio wave K2 disc) simply hangs together beautifully, the quintet perfectly ‘in the pocket’ and Byrd’s trumpet sonorous and sweet, yet extended. Pollini playing Beethoven late piano sonatas [DG] has similar class. The BA31 delivers a sublime sense of performance, more performance-stressed than impact oriented – it has that detail, but doesn’t over-stress this aspect.

I like to think of the Burmester BA31 as a Plantagenet king – simultaneously courteous and cultured, and capable of unleashing great power when it’s called for. These are speakers that can play softly in the background, yet let slip the musical dogs of war when needed. And it can be slotted into some difficult rooms with ease thanks to the Ambience system. If this is a part of Dieter’s legacy, it’s something to be proud of, and comes strongly recommended.

Technical Specifications

Type: Two and a half way ported floorstanding loudspeaker with rear-mounted ‘ambience’ drive unit
Drivers: rear: 1× AMT tweeter, front: 1× AMT tweeter, 2× 170mm cone mid-bass units
Crossover frequencies: 400Hz, 3kHz
Frequency response: 38Hz–45kHz (± 3dB)
Rated power: 200W
Efficiency: 87dB (2.83V, 1m)
Impedance: 4-8 Ω
Nominal impedance: 4 Ω
Finishes: Macassar, light and dark walnut, solid white, solid black (all high gloss)
Dimensions (W×D×H): 25.3×105×37.5cm
Weight: 40.5kg
Price: £16,250 per pair

Manufactured by: Burmester Audiosysteme GmbH

URL: www.burmester.de

Tel: +49 30 787 968 0

Back to reviews

Stillpoints Apertures acoustic panels

Many years ago, I decided that my ear and brain were the best acoustic treatments sound could get. The thing with acoustic treatments in general is that dealing with one area often merely shifts the problem to another, hence those towering absorbing pillars that tend to sprout up around larger rooms. Sound quality is, to a large extent, a matter of personal taste, and this means that one man’s over-damped acoustic is another man’s flat room. And there’s that word ‘flat’. Place a microphone where your head is usually situated, play some tones, and you can see the room’s response with a spectrum analyser. I had an acoustician friend come to do this in my listening room and show me a picture of the room in real time. There were humps and dips everywhere.

Of course, knowing more precisely what is happening acoustically is only the start, but it does provide the means to attempt a correction. For instance, I was able to watch the effect that various devices had on my room’s response and then, by listening to music, make a judgement as to whether they actually worked and this, I think, is the crux of the whole exercise. It is completely understandable that you want your music to sound at its best. Getting there – acoustically anyway – is a very different story. Let’s face it, the sound and acoustics are never going to be perfect (whatever perfect is). For me, at least, there is little else that is as uncomfortable and atmospherically cloying as an over-damped room. I would say that a relaxed listening space is at least as important as an acoustically balanced one; achieving both can be difficult.

Acoustic consultants will design or treat spaces where music is to be played (or played-back) – be it a concert hall, recording studio control room or even a listening room – with a view to reverberation times and reflections etc. But there is no machine or set of calculations within their armoury that will guarantee that the space will actually sound any good. If there was, then concert halls and recording studio control rooms would sound a lot better than they do. The recording studio trend toward using small speakers of low quality affixed on or near the desk itself (let’s call them ‘near-field monitors’ as it sounds cooler) began as much for the unruly behaviour of mammoth cabinets with massive bass drivers traditionally employed as some sort of reference point. The problem was that these ‘near-field monitors’ provided no reference at all, but rather a cacophony of booming bass with cutting edge sizzle transplanted on top. Articulation? Forget it. Let’s listen through the little ‘uns.

But back to the domestic listening room where the problems are similar but on a different scale. There is no ‘perfect’ acoustic, but there is music. We need it in our lives and we want to make it as accessible and involving as we can, so we often embark on a path of system improvements but seldom take effective steps toward addressing the behaviour of the room. Most of us have to live there as well. Over the years, I have tried everything, from tiny bowls of different metals strategically attached to the walls, to towering micro perforated panels, and plenty in between. All made a difference, but somehow I have managed to live without them, preferring the raw and rather reflective nature of my ‘over-live’ listening room. I like a bright, live sound it seems, and it’s amazing what you can get used to.

I was very surprised when I heard that Stillpoints had ventured into the acoustic arena and thought that their Aperture panels initially looked like they would probably be employed as absorbers for a bit of bass cleansing. However, I was wrong. What came as a huge surprise to me was just how precise our hearing and memories are when it comes to our own listening rooms. In hindsight, it really shouldn’t have been so surprising.

My first exposure to the Apertures came when I unpacked six of them and initially sat them hard against the rear wall on the floor, between and behind the speakers that were standing about a metre out. Close your eyes when you are listening and hopefully the lack of visual distraction will enable you to concentrate and have a better connection with the music. When I did this with the Apertures sitting there I couldn’t believe how the rear wall had almost vanished. The acoustic space between the speakers, where most of the musical action was happening, had taken on a completely different dimension. It seems to me that when we listen we subconsciously map the room’s boundaries, but only become aware of it when something radically changes. With the Apertures lined up in admittedly haphazard fashion the boundary between the wall and the floor vanished. The effect was initially stunning. Not just the change of depth perspectives, but also the increase in instrumental freedom, and the improved focus of the music. Reviewers like to speak of the sound becoming detached from the speakers, and this is indeed a good thing. But here was a whole new way of achieving that. After early listening I began to understand why Stillpoints had explored this area. In many ways it was not that different from what they had been doing for years. Their resonance control products free the music, giving it more air, much more speed, and instrumental eloquence and control, right down to note level. These panels will also help remove the music from the mechanical confines of the system. The Apertures were doing something very similar but within the room’s acoustic: both panels and the Apertures can have equally profound effects.

Each Aperture measures 560mm square and 75mm deep. They can be supplied in a couple of forms. The solid-wood framed versions were the ones I used. The special fabric that covers the working parts is recessed within the frame. According to Stillpoints, identifying exactly the right material took time. The fabric they chose won’t sag, and will resist probing fingers and return to shape. Using dye-sublimation printing they can also be used to imprint anything from a company logo to a highly detailed photograph and still remain sharp, taut, and acoustically transparent. There is another version of the Aperture where the cloth covers the whole of the panel and the internal frame in these is formed from plywood.

Stillpoints are understandably a bit more guarded as to exactly what is contained behind the grille. Essentially, the Apertures incorporate three technologies: an absorber, a diffusor, and a resonator. These treatments are obviously available individually through other acoustic solution products. But this is a relatively small and domestically acceptable design that claims to do a bit of everything. I do know that the absorber is a heavily bonded fibreglass design that traps moving air into crevices to limit its reflection. It is designed to self-attenuate with changing volume levels in the listening room itself, and the aim is to form a kind of acoustic vortex, rather like a sonic Black Hole.

All in all, the Aperture is a reasonably compact device that shouldn’t be too difficult to accommodate in most rooms, and achieving this is where the interesting part begins. Each panel can be fixed to the wall with the lightweight metal attachment provided and hung like a picture; or they can be left freestanding at floor level or sitting on a convenient support anywhere in the room. The third way incorporates a mounting method I have yet to see, which is supplied by a US-based company called Sound Anchors. This is an adapted speaker stand supplemented with a fitting capable of accepting between one and six Aperture panels for either a semi-permanent or mobile approach to room acoustics. These stands are available through Sound Anchors themselves and not Stillpoints, although Sound Anchors are now manufacturing speaker stands that actually incorporate Stillpoints Ultra devices so the collaboration between the companies has been fairly established.

My listening room is different to yours, so it’s impossible to make hard and fast rules as to where you should place the Apertures. But I can suggest that if you sit with your back close to a wall then that wall will be a very wise place to start. Additionally, the wall behind the speakers is a prime candidate for treatment, as is the area between the speakers on the rear wall, though some experimentation with height is recommended. You will certainly have an intuitive feeling where the best place will be, but I would strongly advise that you have a bit of fun and move them around. I guarantee you will be surprised. Side walls and just about anywhere that first reflections might be a problem are prime positions for the Apertures. They can open the acoustics of narrow rooms enormously by reducing the effects of reflections when mounted, probably at driver height, along the walls. Longer rooms might ideally need two per side, and really large spaces could require even more treatment. This is obviously where a free mounting system like the Sound Anchors stands could come in handy.

I listen across a through-lounge so the room is in many ways unbalanced. To my left is another room and to my right is a large bay window. I found that placing a single Aperture at head height to my left effectively attenuated the large, open acoustic space so much that it became actually audibly confining, and although it balanced the room and made it more acoustically symmetrical, I didn’t like it at all. Again, it is a question of making an audio map of your own space. I discovered, or should I say reconfirmed, that I really don’t like a lot of damping in my room and I don’t want anything in there that ‘closes’ the space too much. What is great about the Apertures is that you can use them strategically both to focus the music and to bring its whole field of sound closer without negative effects on tonal balance.

The film music from the Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) really shows what the Aperture can bring to the musical experience. Bowed instruments can be so very expressive in the hands of a sensitive master, and the central theme of the movie is quite lovely through just about any system, anywhere. But with five Apertures in the room, two on the rear wall, one behind each speaker, and one in the middle the acoustic space, opened up the sound in all dimensions. The Apertures have an uncanny ability to ‘quieten’ a space and remove boundary effects without excessive damping or any noticeable attenuation of high frequencies. This gives full rein to the dynamics, large and small, and especially to the gorgeous textures of the instruments. With the panels in place, the main theme was achingly beautiful, and the phrasing exquisite. The almost languid bowing brought a velvet texture brimming with tightly gathered harmonics that elevated the performance immensely. Another bowed instrument – I don’t know its name, but presumably of classical Chinese origin – had an open-throated character unsettlingly like a human voice. Pure, plaintive, and unbelievably sweet, this instrument’s unusual tonal envelope and note ‘shape’ soared into the room, free of the confines of the system. It reached out and touched all who were listening. Remove the Apertures and it is still good, but calming those areas of the room usually excited by the energy of the instrument bought it closer and left it so much more vivid that it was thrilling. All who were present agreed. It wasn’t just the change in perspectives or the spooky expansion in width and depth, though these are welcome additions; it was the increase in instrumental freedom, the clarity of supporting instruments, and of course, the remarkable opening of acoustic space beyond the room boundaries that was so beguiling.

With the Apertures it’s getting this balance right that is the trick. Unlike other panels that seem to take some of the music with them, the Apertures don’t. Tord Gustavsen and his trio are cool, slightly aloof musicians playing on Manfred Eicher’s ECM label. ‘Being There’ is my favourite title and it is ECM to the core. Dark, sonorous backgrounds and an eerie quietness to the recordings bring a sombre and rather serious tone to Manfred’s recording sound. I have always found the piano to be rather dark, but the Apertures were effective here. They increased the recording space and left a glow to the piano and actually improved the attack and shape of each note.

Melody Gardot’s albums, and in particular The Absence, continues to hold an elusive fascination for me, but I have to pick the times I listen to it very carefully. Late night, in the still air is when I usually reach for it. For me it can offer a seriously immersive listening experience, and if I enjoyed the intimacy and nakedness of her emotional baggage before, then the addition of the Apertures only intensified this. When an artist feels as if she is singing to you and telling you her story, it’s certainly special. But to hear the relationship between her and the musicians change so radically so it seems as if she moves closer to you and further into the room is astonishing. I have seldom heard a listening space so wonderfully ripe with an atmosphere positively dripping with presence.

There is nothing new in the world of acoustics from the point of view of the way that sound behaves. Most of it has been known for decades, but now there are new materials and inspired thinking about how to make use of such knowledge. The Apertures demonstrate this. They work excellently, but do require some experimentation to get the desired effects. Ultimately, the Apertures are the acoustic treatment for those who aren’t particularly looking for any. Yes, they can certainly help with the usual listening room anomalies, but they can go much further than that. As I mentioned before, placement is everything, but their potential can be huge. They will treat standing waves, and they can tidy up troublesome corners; but after several months’ use I see them as an invaluable tool that focuses the music, and reduces boundary effects. The Apertures are also the perfect accompaniment to a Stillpoints-equipped system: together they work brilliantly.

If you can borrow a few from your dealer have an open mind and the taste for experimentation; I would absolutely recommend that you give them a try.

Technical Specifications

Type: Acoustic Panels
Fixings: Picture rail-type fittings supplied. Sound Anchor stands available
Finishes: Walnut, Dark Cherry, Maple. Available with or without visible wooden frame. Different grille colours also available
Dimensions (WxHxD): 560x560x75mm
Weight: varies according to covering
Price: £600 per panel.

Manufactured by: Stillpoints

URL: www.stillpoints.us

Distributed by: Kog Audio

URL: www.kogaudio.com

Tel: +44 (0) 24 7722 0650

Back to reviews

YG Acoustics Carmel 2 floorstanding loudspeaker

YG Acoustics is based in Arvada, Colorado in the USA and in the States it is widely regarded as one of the ‘big three’ high-end loudspeaker manufacturers—the other two members of this exclusive group being Wilson Audio and Magico. But, in the UK at least, YG had a relatively low profile. However, that’s set to change, because the brand has returned to the UK under the auspices of the Cambridge-based distributor, Padood, Ltd. It’s our opinion that great pleasures await discerning UK listeners who audition the brand’s products, and we thought it might be good to start out with the firm’s most compact and least expensive model: the £22,800 Carmel 2 floorstanding loudspeaker.

Before we begin, I should supply several pieces of background information, if only to set a context for this review. First, my listening room, which measures about 14’ x 17.7’ (4.3×5.4m), is about the size of a medium-large UK lounge—it’s not a huge space, but neither is it a small 8’ x 8’ parlour. Second, I have had extensive experience with YG Acoustic’s original Carmel loudspeaker, which I favourably reviewed several years ago for our U.S.-based sister publication The Absolute Sound. In that publication, the original Carmel went on to win accolades as a loudspeaker of the year within its price class. Moreover, I would say that between then and now, I have long regarded the original Carmel as a ‘personal best’ of sorts, in that it set a high-water mark for overall audio system performance in my home—a mark that remained unchallenged until quite recently, when I heard first the superb GamuT RS3 standmount monitors reviewed in issue 127, and now the Carmel 2 floorstanders.

Recognising that the original Carmel was one of the best loved (and best selling) of all YG products, the YG team were very keen on having me hear the new Carmel 2 in comparison with the original Carmels. Accordingly, they arranged for both sets of speakers to be sent to my home for back-to-back listening sessions, so that I could better understand and—they hoped—appreciate the differences between the models. Consequently, this is not only a review of the Carmel 2, but also a comparison between it and its critically acclaimed predecessor.

The Carmel 2 is a two-way, two-driver floorstanding loudspeaker whose sealed, non-vented enclosure is constructed of CNC-machined panels carved from thick, solid plates of high-quality, aircraft-grade aluminium. The panels, in turn, are pressure-assembled using an exclusive YG process that effectively draws the panels together with great force, creating an airtight and exceptionally rigid enclosure that resists unwanted vibration and resonance. The Carmel 2, whose design shape is that of a slender, swept-back, and gently tapered tower, appears at first glance to use flat (or nearly flat) cabinet panels. Closer inspection, however, reveals that the speaker’s 3.5cm thick front baffle consists of a symphony of subtle and complex compound curves (it’s truly a work of machining art). The Carmel 2, like all YG speakers, is offered either in satin black or silver-anodised finishes.

Although you might never guess this from the external appearance of the Carmel 2, the loudspeaker’s enclosure is internally subdivided into three computer-optimised chambers, the support structures for which feature very small quantities of precision-placed damping materials that help eliminate specific resonances, without imposing a ‘lossy’ or ‘high-friction’ operating environment for the drivers. YG has decided to call this targeted approach to resonance reduction ‘Focused Elimination’ technology, which actually works and works well as far as I could tell.

The Carmel 2 driver array consists of a proprietary YG-designed and manufactured 184mm ‘BilletCore’ mid-bass driver and a 27mm ‘ForgeCore’ tweeter whose diaphragm is manufactured to YG specifications by Scan-Speak but whose motor assembly is designed and manufactured solely by YG. By comparison, the drivers used in the original Carmel were both modified Scan-Speak units.

The term ‘BilletCore’ refers to the fact that the Carmel 2’s mid-bass driver diaphragm, which in finished form weighs just 10 grams, is cut from a two kilogram billet of aircraft aluminium. Although this might seem an extreme manufacturing approach, YG’s contention is that it yields a diaphragm that exhibits extraordinary dimensional uniformity and structural integrity throughout, without any of the microscopic stress cracks, stretch marks, or unit-to-unit variations in material strength and/or thickness as found in stamped, woven, or injection moulded driver diaphragms. The result, says YG, is a mid-bass driver that offers greater strength, significantly lower distortion, and more predictable behaviour over its entire operating range than any competing composite, metal, or ceramic diaphragm-equipped driver.

The term ‘ForgeCore’ refers to the fact that the motor assembly/magnet structure of the tweeter starts out as a CNC-machined steel forging “with some non-machinable features”, which are then given “computer-optimized, highly sophisticated 3D geometries” via CNC-cutting of various magnet/motor system parts. According to YG, these 3D-optimised machining processes together yield a dramatic reduction in tweeter distortion—especially in comparison between the Carmel 2’s ForgeCore tweeters and the original Carmel’s custom-built Scan-Speak tweeter.

Both in terms of concept and execution, the Carmel 2’s crossover network is very distinctive. Conceptually, the crossover circuit was created using YG Acoustic’s proprietary ‘DualCoherent’ speaker design software, which is said to be the only CAD program of its type capable of simultaneously optimising both linear frequency response and linear phase response. The nominal crossover point is 1.75kHz. As so often happens, though, the genius of the crossover lies in the details of its execution. YG was dissatisfied with the overall performance and quality of traditional printed circuit boards, so as an alternative it found a way to bond very thick layers of pure copper to underlying fibreglass circuit board material and then to CNC-cut the crossover circuit into the copper side of the board. The result is a non-traditional circuit board, with circuit traces that provide higher quality conductor materials and more precise trace placement and dimensions than any traditional etched-type PCB could offer. Populating the crossover board are very low noise resistors, exotic and expensive oil-filled Mundorf capacitors, and YG’s own ‘ToroAir’ toroid-wound, air core inductors (which space does not permit me to describe in as much detail as these very special inductors probably warrant).

Put simply, YG Acoustics not only pursues cutting-edge loudspeaker performance and technologies, but also is obsessed with achieving the highest-possible quality in both materials and assembly processes. In fact, perhaps the best way to think of YG products would be to picture them as the sort of loudspeakers that ultra-high-tech defence contractors might build if they ever decided to apply themselves to the art and science of high-end audio. But when the music finally meets the metal, so to speak, are the results as impressive as we might hope?

Let me start by stating unequivocally that the Carmel 2 really does sound better than the already-excellent first-generation Carmel. Those who have heard and enjoyed the original Carmel will know that this is no mean feat because the first Carmel enjoyed a reputation for being YG’s ‘magical’ model—the model where a confluence of complex musical performance variables made for a loudspeaker that was extremely revealing yet unfailingly musical and that seemingly could do no wrong. Coming into this review, then, I couldn’t help but wonder if the Carmel 2 would actually be a step forward. As it turns out, though, I needn’t have worried since the YG team was most definitely on its ‘A’ game when it created the Carmel 2, meaning that it handily outperforms the original Carmel in virtually every way.

First, I found the Carmel 2 to be more detailed, more revealing, and more finely focused than the original Carmel, yet at the same time it also delivered a noticeably smoother and more coherent presentation. Honestly, this is a rare and desirable combination, since many loudspeakers that offer ‘enhanced detail’ all too often extract a toll in the form of unwanted rough edges or excess upper midrange/treble brightness. With the Carmel 2, however, this simply is not the case; instead, the speaker digs out more low-level textural and transient information than either the original Carmel or most of the other speakers I’ve heard in its price class, yet it does so without imposing any noticeable sonic penalties (well, apart from the fact that it will inevitably show how and where poor recordings stray from the path of sonic goodness). Stated another way, the Carmel 2 gives us substantial musical gains, without any sonic ‘collateral damage’ whatsoever.

Second, the upper midrange and treble regions of the Carmel 2 enjoy noticeably greater freedom from grain than do those same regions as heard either in the original Carmel or in contemporary like-priced competing high-end loudspeakers. For this reason, ‘silkiness’ (or perhaps ‘silky smoothness’) is a term that comes up early and often in any discussion of the Carmel 2’s sound. It is important to understand that this is not the sort of ‘silkiness’ that is audiophile code-speak for ‘a speaker that sweeps sonic problems under the rug or glosses them over with a layer of artificial sweetness. On the contrary, the Carmel 2 is highly transparent and revealing; it’s just that it goes about its work without so much as trace of obnoxious edginess or abrasiveness.

Put on a recording that is rich in upper midrange and treble spatial and reverberant details, such Zhao Cong’s ‘Moonlight on Spring River’ from Sound of China [Focus] and the benefits are immediately apparent. Instead of presenting soundstages comprised of multiple two-dimensional layers of sound, much like photographs slid atop one another in a folder, the Carmel 2s instead creates unusually deep and strikingly three-dimensional (indeed, almost sculptural) soundstages, while also conveying the sense of air as a fluid medium that gently surrounds and support each of the instruments in play.

For a speaker that is not terribly large in volume, the Carmel 2 demonstrates truly astonishing power handling capabilities and vibrant, full-bodied dynamics. It also belies its modest size by serving up surprisingly deep, powerful, and extended bass. You can happily play rhythmic and percussion-orientated material through the Carmel 2, such as the bouncy, funky, and appropriately named ‘Bass and Drums’ from John Paul Jones’ Zooma [Discipline Global Mobile] without feeling any need for a subwoofer or larger speaker. Crank up the volume to realistic levels and the Carmel 2 just grins and plays along, typically taking anything you might care to play in its stride. The same holds true when playing pipe organ material rich in low-frequency content, which the Carmel 2 happily reproduces with powerful and shuddering depth tempered by an excellent measure of control.

Such impressive performance should not be all that surprising given two factors in the Carmel 2’s design. First, the speaker’s drivers and especially its crossover network were developed with high power-handling in mind, and second Carmel 2’s usable bass response extends all the way down to 32Hz, which counts as genuinely low bass by any rational standard. Unless you like listening to subsonic blasts at near deafening levels, you should find that the Carmel 2 serves admirably as a satisfyingly full range loudspeaker—or at least it does when used in mid-sized rooms like mine.

While the Carmel 2 is a relatively compact loudspeaker, please do not be deceived by its size. This compact and exquisitely made floorstander is a legitimate ultra-high-end loudspeaker—one that offers transparency, detail, neutrality of voicing, and overall refinement comparable to YG Acoustics’ larger and significantly more expensive Hailey and Sonja loudspeakers, but in a smaller package and at a more manageable price. The Carmel 2 is without a doubt an unqualified design triumph.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Type: Two-way, two-driver floorstanding loudspeaker with an acoustic suspension enclosure CNC‑machined from solid aircraft aluminium.
Driver complement: One 27mm fabric-dome ForgeCore tweeter, one 184mm aluminium-diaphragm BilletCore mid-bass driver
Frequency response: 32Hz – 40 kHz, ± 2dB, ±5° relative phase throughout the entire overlap (region between the mid-bass driver and tweeter)
Impedance: 4 Ohms nominal, 3.5 Ohms minimum
Sensitivity: 87dB/2.83V/1m 2π anechoic
Dimensions (H × W × D): 103 × 23 × 31cm
Weight: 34kg per speaker, unpackaged
Finishes: Black or Silver anodised aluminium
Price: £22,800/pair

Manufacturer Information: YG Acoustics LLC, 4941 Allison St. Unit 10, Arvada, CO 80002 U.S.A.

Tel: +1 801-726-3887

URL: www.yg-acoustics.com

Distributor Information: Padood Ltd., CBI Business Centre, Twenty Station Rd., Cambridge, UK CBI 2JD

Tel: +44 (0)1223 653199

E-mail: [email protected]

Back to reviews

PS Audio Yale OS firmware for the DirectStream DAC

Have you ever purchased an audio product only to learn that the manufacturer had released a new, improved, and upgraded version of your new baby only a few short months after you plunked down your hard-earned cash? If you have, I’m sure you might agree that it’s a frustrating (even maddening) experience, to say the least. In an instant, your pride and joy has become ‘last year’s model’, perhaps even obsolete. But when it comes to PS Audio’s critically acclaimed DirectStream DAC (reviewed in issue 125), I’m pleased to say that owners will be spared the ravages of unforeseen ‘early obsolescence’ and here’s why.

The DirectStream DAC is not so much a singular digital-to-analogue converter in the usual audiophile’s sense of the term, but rather a flexible, powerful, FPGA-equipped and DSP-enhanced digital audio decoding platform whose operation and sonic performance are in very real ways governed by the operating system software the device happens to be running at the time. The term ‘platform’ here is deliberate, to convey the idea that the DirectStream DAC’s sonic performance can and does (along with the unit’s operational characteristics) evolve over time as better and more sophisticated operating system software becomes available. Obviously, this ambitious software-driven product evolution schema sounds promising, at least in theory, but do the real world results make good on PS Audio’s promises? The short answer is that they do.

When I reviewed the DirectStream DAC earlier this year, the device arrived with PS Audio’s then current ‘Pikes Peak’ operating system installed. By all accounts, the Pikes Peak-equipped DAC sounded better than did versions equipped with earlier iterations of operating software, but since I hadn’t heard those earlier versions I basically had to accept reports of sonic improvements as an article of faith. In any event, I came away highly impressed by the Pikes Peak-equipped DAC, especially its detailed, gracious, and free-flowing presentation, which reminded me of the sound of high-quality analogue master tapes (minus the tape hiss).

Lately, however, PS Audio has released a new DirectStream DAC operating system upgrade named Yale (not after the famous Ivy-league university, but after Colorado’s Mount Yale—which PS notes is one of “the 53 mountain peaks in the state that rise above 14,000 feet.”). In a press release on the new OS, DirectStream DAC designer Ted Smith said, “For Yale, I rewrote about half of the DSP code to take advantage of what we’ve learned about noise and jitter from the FPGA.” According to PS, the new OS also reduces the DirectStream DAC’s already low noise floor by 3dB and fixes a few small operational glitches present with the Pikes Peak OS.

OS upgrades are easy to install: download the OS upgrade package from the PS Audio website, load the package on an SD card, power down the DAC, insert the DS card in the DAC rear panel, re-boot the DAC, and wait for the auto-install process to run its course. The amazing part is that the OS upgrade manages—without altering the hardware in any way—to transform the DAC’s sound.

Specifically, I found that with the Yale OS in place, the DirectStream DAC took a significant leap forward in terms of resolution—especially resolution of very low-level textural and reverberant details, and also became even smoother and more mellifluous in its presentation. As a direct result of these changes the DAC sounded noticeably more ‘continuous’ (to borrow a term coined by the late, great audio journalist Harry Pearson) and more convincingly three-dimensional. Perhaps more importantly, the DAC’s ‘palpability factor’ also went way, way up, meaning that sonic images of instruments and human voices became far more solid and vivid with a kind of breath-taking ‘you-are-there’ realism.

These sorts of substantial improvements in sound quality usually take place through costly and elaborate hardware upgrades. Now, however, PS Audio—along with a handful of other forward-looking manufacturers—has shown us a better kind of upgrade path. In the case of the DirectStream DAC, PS Audio’s formula calls for building and selling a hyper-capable hardware platform whose full sonic capabilities are, arguably, not fully known to the design team at the time of the product’s initial release. Then, over time and as the team gains more insight into what their platform can actually do, successive operating system updates tap more and more of the platform’s sonic potential, giving the product an ‘evergreen’ quality that will not rapidly become obsolete. Well done, PS Audio!

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Type: Operating system upgrade software for the PS Audio DirectStream DAC
Noise: Noise floor is reduced by 3dB vis-à-vis the ‘Pikes Peak’ OS
Jitter: Jitter reduced by an unspecified amount vis-à-vis the ‘Pikes Peak’ OS
Storage/Installation requirements: SDHC memory card (OS upgrade software requires approximately 4.1MB of storage capacity)
Price: Free of charge to owners of PS Audio DirectStream DACs

Manufacturer Information: PS Audio

URL: www.psaudio.com

Distributor Information: Signature Audio Systems

Tel: +44(0) 7738 007776

URL: www.signaturesystems.co.uk

Back to reviews

GamuT M250i mono power amplifier

In anticipation of my review of the GamuT RS3 loudspeaker in Hi-Fi+ issue 127, the GamuT team asked if I might consider driving the loudspeakers with a pair of their 250Wpc M250i monoblock amplifiers (priced at £8,658 each). Naturally, I was happy to oblige. Little did I realise at the time that the arrival of the M250i amps would force me to reassess my thinking on the profound, and in this case profoundly positive, impact that truly great amplifiers can have on the overall sound quality of one’s audio system.

While some claim, “all high-quality amps sound pretty much the same”, most Hi-Fi+ readers know that there are in fact clear-cut differences between amplifiers that can be heard by almost anyone willing to listen carefully and critically to his or her audio system. Even so, many of us also have a general notion of the probable magnitude of the sonic changes that amplifier substitutions are apt to make. Quite frankly, after installing the M250i amps in my system and giving them the GamuT-recommended half-hour of warm-up, my preconceived notions regarding the impact of amplifier swaps were immediately and completely upended (in a good way). I say this because the big GamuT amps dramatically took charge of my audio system and transformed it in delightful and somewhat unexpected ways.

Over the years, many of us have encountered (or perhaps even written) amplifier reviews that essentially declare that listeners face a dilemma. They can either choose lithe, agile, and nuanced amplifiers that, sadly, might have relatively limited power output capabilities, or they can select big, robust, and powerful amplifiers that are long on muscle, but potentially not very subtle or quick on their feet. What’s an audiophile to do, then? The Danish firm GamuT responds to this thorny topic with a suitably gnomic question: why not both? GamuT’s answer comes in the form of the M250i monoblocks.

The M250i is a very powerful, wide bandwidth (5Hz –100kHz) amplifier, capable of delivering a conservatively rated 250 watts into an 8 Ohm load, 500 watts into a 4 Ohm load, and a mind-bending 900 watts into a 2 Ohm load (actually, GamuT says the M250i is safe with loads ranging all the way down to 1.5 Ohms, which is the point at which GamuT, in its own words, draws “a line between what is a loudspeaker load, and what is a short circuit”). As you might expect, each amplifier sports a massive power supply complete with a huge toroidal transformer and beefy filter capacitors, which take up considerable space within the amp’s chassis. Internally, the amps use GamuT’s proprietary WormHole wires throughout.

But, to address the agility, nuance, and resolution side of the equation, GamuT has deliberately designed the circuit of the M250i to be as simple and direct as possible and to use—this is the really critical bit—as few amplification devices as possible. Thus, where most brawny amps use large numbers of beefy output transistors in banks, the M250i uses just two identical (not complementary), ultra high-capacity (NPN type) MOSFET output transistors—one per voltage rail—and that’s it; output stage completed.

Why did GamuT take the unorthodox approach of using identical NPN transistors to modulate both the positive and negative voltage supply rails of its amplifier, rather than follow the more common approach of using complementary sets of NPN/PNP transistors? The answer is that so-called complementary transistors are not, strictly speaking, truly complementary. GamuT says the inherent differences between PNP and NPN transistors inevitably “create phase smearing” and require use of compensatory resistors that, “reduce the output stage’s ability to control the speaker.” In contrast, GamuT’s M250i circuit topology “has the benefit that the difference between the two transistors (both of the exact same type) is 100 times smaller than it would be in a normal complementary based circuit.” The result, GamuT claims, “is an output section without crossover distortion, no emitter resistors, and very low distortion, consisting mainly of even-order harmonics.”

As you can imagine the two giant MOSFETs used in the M250i are no ordinary transistors. Benno Meldgaard, GamuT’s chief of design, observes that the huge and very costly MOSFETs used in the M250i do not come from the audio world at all, but rather are ‘industrial strength’ devices “normally used in big welding machines.” GamuT claims that each of these very special MOSFETs can handle “500 watts, and a peak current of 400 Amperes and 100 Amperes long-term,” meaning that just two of the devices are able to meet the amplifier’s hefty power output goals.

To further simplify the M250i circuit for critical listening applications, GamuT has given the amplifier two sets of outputs: one labelled ‘Normal’ and the other ‘Direct’. The Normal output incorporates a Zobel network designed to protect the amplifier from extremely low impedance and/or highly reactive loads. The Direct output, however, deliberately foregoes the Zobel network in the interest of even greater sonic clarity, purity, and immediacy. Meldgaard says that, “in 99% of all situations, the Direct Output can be used.” In our listening tests, we tried both outputs and found that, as claimed, the Direct output really does sound more open, airy, and transparent. Accordingly, we used the Direct output for all of our review listening.

As well as the PS Audio DirectStream DAC and YG Acoustics Carmel 2 loudspeaker system used in this extended feature, I also tried two other demanding (and revealing) loudspeaker systems: the Magnepan 3.7i planar magnetic panels, and GamuT’s own RS3 standmount monitors.

First, let’s observe the obvious; the M250i amps are well and truly powerful and have all the current drive capabilities any sane listener could want. As a result, the GamuT amps took the notably power-hungry Magnepan 3.7i’s to higher levels of performance than I had ever heard from them before (and I have heard them with a wide variety of amplifiers). Bass immediately seemed deeper, more articulate, and had greater impact, while dynamic capabilities all across the audio spectrum were markedly improved. The result was that, with the GamuTs in charge, the Magnepan 3.7i’s started to sound more than a little like their bigger brothers, the firm’s flagship 20.7 loudspeakers. To be sure, the 20.7 is still the better speaker, but the GamuTs helped Magnepan’s number two model close the gap considerably.

But what was impressive was not just the quantity of power on offer, but also the quality of the power. Some big amps are sadly a bit like competitive weightlifters: that is, massively strong, but not necessarily individuals you would want to see performing at the ballet. The M250i, on the other hand, is more like the equivalent of an imaginary, scaled-up version of Mikhail Baryshnikov in his prime. Suddenly, power and grace along with agility, expressiveness, and raw grunt come together in one remarkably capable package.

To hear what I mean by these comments, Mark O’Connor’s ‘Fanfare for the Common Man’ from the album of the same name [Sony Classical] makes a perfect illustration. The first four minutes of the composition are exactly what you might expect from an orchestral fanfare, complete with soaring and heroic brass section statements punctuated by deep, thunderously powerful tympani outbursts. The M250i’s take all of these things in their stride. But at about the four-minute mark the piece changes mood, emphasising softer, but quicker-paced passages featuring the voice of O’Connor’s solo violin. In an instant, the focus shifts from power to speed, subtlety, and nuance—a challenge that the big GamuTs answer with a deft, sure touch as well as cat-quick reflexes.

To further illustrate this point, try listening to Zhao Jia Zhen’s performance of ‘Three Refrains on the Yangquan Pass’ from Masterpieces of the Chinese Qin from the Tang Dynasty to Today [Rhymoi], as performed on a period-correct Song Dynasty Qin. The Qin is moderately large and typically seven-stringed fretless Chinese instrument, ancient in its origins, that is renowned for the many soulful and thought-provoking textures and moods its sound can evoke. It is, in short, an instrument that is all about subtlety and finesse all the time. The GamuT amps, playing through the YG Acoustics Carmel 2 speakers, met these demands with a performance that was delicate, perfectly paced, highly transparent, and heartbreakingly beautiful. On recording after recording, this pattern repeated itself, with the GamuT amps managing to sound big and powerful, yet small and agile, all at the same time.

GamuT’s M250i monoblock amps have proven revelatory for me. They are one of the very few amplifiers I have ever heard that can combine world-class power delivery and dynamic clout with all the subtlety, expressiveness, and pace that one could possible desire. Now if that’s not audio magic of the first rank, then I can’t imagine what else would be. Passionately recommended.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Type: Solid-state monoblock power amplifier
Analogue inputs: One single ended (via RCA jack), one balanced (via 3-pin XLR jack)
Analogue outputs: Two pairs of speaker taps (via 5-way binding posts): one Normal with Zobel network protection, one Direct without Zobel network features
Power output: 250 watts @ 8 Ohms, 500 watts a 4 Ohms, 900 watts at 2 Ohms, stable into loads as low as 1.5 Ohms
Bandwidth: 5Hz–100kHz
Signal to Noise Ratio: At least -100dB at full output (250 watts at 8 Ohms)
Dimensions (H×W×D): 164 × 431 × 470mm
Weight: 38kg/each
Price: £8,658/each, £17,308/pair
Manufacturer Information: GamuT A/S

URL: www.gamutaudio.com

UK Distributor: Sound Fowndations

Tel.: +44 (0) 118 9814238

URL: www.soundfowndations.co.uk

US Distributor: GamuT USA

Tel: +1 888-252-2499

Back to reviews

The Rules Of The Road

Audio reviewers just love car analogies, the perfect shorthand for the cost/performance/benefits curve. Often it’s just laziness or a mistaken impression that they’re actually audio’s answer to Jeremy Clarkson (same shape, just without the audience figures or the money) but there’s one area in which the parallels are too close to ignore. Motorsport and audio are all about the same thing: performance – and how to achieve it. When it comes to trying to build a decent hi-fi system, the conceptual challenges are surprisingly similar to building a sports car – just without the comfort blanket of meaningful, empirical performance indicators.

Buy a car with a published performance that includes a sub-four second 0-62mph figure and you probably think you know what you are getting. But do you? It’s undoubtedly quick and it definitely takes off from the lights, but to actually reach a mile-a-minute in less than four seconds, you need a professional driver, slick tyres, perfect weather, and a perfectly manicured drag strip – not a weekend warrior on the Clapham High Road. More to the point, there’s actually no guarantee that if you race a car with a 4.2 second 0-62 figure away from the lights, you are actually going to achieve that target. It’s all down to the conditions and the vehicle that’s best suited to them. When it comes to actually going under the four-second barrier, it’s all about creating the conditions for optimum performance – or realizing potential – and hi-fi systems are just the same. Get the right car, the right driver, the right mechanic, fuel, tyres, and track – and you’ll see that car at its best. Bolt together an engine from one source, a chassis from another, add a bunch of tuning parts and fill it with something you found in a can at the back of the garage, and you’ll be lucky if it even starts – yet that’s exactly what a lot of people do with audio equipment. Then they wonder why they’ve stopped listening to it. Most end users spend too much time agonizing over the equipment choices and not nearly enough worrying about giving that equipment a fighting chance. The boxes might well be the sexy bits, but they quickly lose their allure if you can’t hear what they’re doing – and that’s definitely down to the operational environment.

The enduring popularity of What Hi-Fi and the Stereophile Recommended Components listings rests on the buyer’s need for answers. But we all know (including the people handing out those Five-Star reviews and Class A ratings) that simply assembling a system made from those prize-winning components is a recipe for disaster. The problem is that, even leaving matching and set-up issues aside, picking products off somebody else’s short list is like letting a total stranger choose your meal in a restaurant – somebody who has never met you and has no idea that you suffer from violent food allergies!

The first step to building a really good hi-fi system is understanding that the only person who can provide those ‘which product’ answers is you. So rather than trying to offer you short cuts that turn out to be dead ends, spurious ‘recommendations’ that ultimately don’t deliver, perhaps it’s time to approach this problem from the other end. If magazines can’t (and really shouldn’t try to) provide universal recommendations, perhaps they should work on making it easier to arrive at really meaningful answers of your own. With that in mind, and couched in the form of a loose assortment of half a dozen motoring truisms, three devoted to establishing a decent operational foundation for your system, three concerned with selecting the system itself, here are the golden rule of system building success. Following them won’t guarantee musical satisfaction (there’s a bit more to it than that) but ignore even one and you’ll be severely limiting your system’s potential. How do you build a system? Here’s how…

Rule 1. Don’t try and run a top fuel dragster on diesel

When you listen to an audio system, you are actually listening to your AC supply. The electricity that comes out of the wall is the raw material that is converted into sound – and just like any other process, the resulting performance depends on the quality of the fuel you use. The increasing use of wireless communication systems, switching power supplies, and the massive increase in electrical components loading the national grid all contribute to a situation where AC quality is at an all-time low. What we tend to forget is that a lot of those problems emanate from within our own houses, with multiple appliances, computers, mobile/wireless phones, and data systems all polluting the immediate area. Running a single, dedicated mains spur to feed your audio system, preferably wired with a screened, heavy-gauge cable, and selected sockets and hardware in the fuse-box is possibly the single most cost effective contribution you can make to the performance of your audio system. It might not offer the instantaneous gratification of a NOS injection system, but believe me, the benefits are both permanent and absolutely fundamental.

Rule 2. Don’t try and drive a Ferrari across a ploughed field

Let’s be honest, you wouldn’t do it: indeed, you probably couldn’t do it – not enough ground clearance or suspension travel. The Ferrari is definitely designed to run – in fact, will pretty much only run – on perfectly smooth surfaces. Your audio system is the same. Think of discontinuities in the signal path or external mechanical interference as the furrows of that field and you begin to get the picture. Each microphonic intrusion or change in the materials or nature of the cables connecting your boxes together will erode performance, destroying the linearity and musical coherence you are trying so hard (and spending so much) to preserve. In turn, what that means is that you need to pay attention to what sits between your equipment and the floor and what connects it together. So choose racks and shelves that are dispersive and non-resonant in nature – which means avoiding welded steel, glass and if possible MDF. They need to provide a stable and level surface and also consider what (if any) isolation the structure provides from the outside world, between the rack and the floor or the rack and its shelves: and no, spikes don’t count. Likewise, choose your cables (all of them, including the power cords) from a single, coherent range, where a manufacturer uses the same conductor, dielectric materials and design concept across all the products.

Rule 3. It’s all about traction…

All the power in the world is no good to you if you can’t hook it up – and spinning wheels don’t get you very far. In motoring terms you can talk about torque and tyres, but it’s the road surface that is ultimately the limiting factor. For audio systems, the equivalent constraint is the signal to noise ratio, or noise floor: it’s the other side of the isolation/integration argument outlined above – just even more critical. In this case it’s all about grounding – mechanical and electrical. In real terms, what you are seeking to isolate or protect isn’t the equipment but the signal path within it and that’s an important distinction. As well as mechanical energy reaching the signal path from the air and the floor, via the rack, the equipment generates internal mechanical energy too. Transformers vibrate, as do capacitors as they charge and discharge and other components as they pass the signal. The actual level of the energy might be low, but it is right where the signal is, making it disproportionately destructive. To make matters worse, the soft ‘isolation feet’ fitted to most products actually trap that energy inside your electronics where it smudges the signal and raises the noise floor. Hard couplers that ground the chassis to a dispersive supporting surface (which could be as simple as a plywood or laminated bamboo shelf) provide an exit path for that energy – generally with pretty dramatic results. The resulting drop in noise floor, increase in dynamic range and improvements in timing and rhythmic articulation can have a profound impact on just how listenable your system is. Ever wondered how those ‘isolation’ cones worked? Now you know – and it’s not by isolating the equipment!

Likewise, there’s no substitute for a clean ground when it comes to reducing the electrical contribution to the system’s noise floor. Use a single, star-grounded distribution block to power your equipment, with the centre of the star connected not just to the main AC ground but also to a separate ground-post buried in your garden and you’ll experience an equally dramatic reduction in grain, a blacker background behind the music, richer, more vibrant colours and more emphatic dynamics – all crucial to your system’s musical expression and sense of emotional communication. Once again it’s a cheap and easy fix that delivers results it’s hard to credit – until you experience them.

Once you’ve paid attention to the basic steps outlined above you will have established conditions of operation that will give your equipment a fighting chance of performing somewhere near its potential – and you a fighting chance of hearing what it’s doing and the musical impact of any changes or choices you might make. Now it’s time to look at the system selection guidelines…

Rule 4. Don’t try to bolt a big engine to a tiny transmission

There are certain critical junctions in any system; joins where the parts need to mate seamlessly if the whole is going to become greater than the sum of the parts. In a car, it goes way beyond whether the mating parts use metric dimensions or not: the design team needs to consider power and torque curves, gear ratios, and performance goals. Audio systems are exactly the same, except that the critical junctions are not necessarily quite so obvious. We tend to divide systems into three parts: source components, amplification, and speakers. In fact, we should divide them in two: everything up to the amplifier inputs and everything after them. The electrical relationship between the driving amplifier and the speaker load it is connected to is so critical that it cannot possibly be separated if you want to get everything out of both components. The speaker/amplifier pairing should be chosen together (even if you are not buying them together), matched to each other and the room in which they’ll be used. That’s the only way to achieve the best possible performance.

Rule 5. Straight line speed gets you nowhere fast if you don’t have the handling to match

The chassis and suspension might not be the most visible or the sexiest part of a car, but they are what joins the engine to the wheels, keeps those wheels on the ground and that car on the road. In an audio system, that role is occupied by the line-stage – and it can totally make or break the performance of the system as a whole. Over the years, ever since the advent of CD, it has been fashionable to try and eliminate the line-stage from the audio signal path, either replacing it with a variable output source component (as championed by Wadia and dCS, amongst others) or a passive pre-amp of some description. In my view, what benefits that seem to come with direct connection or passive control are merely a reflection of how bad many line-stages really are. For something that on paper at least, should be so simple, designing a decent line-stage is incredibly difficult – making worthwhile examples rare if not necessarily expensive. In fact, it’s really what establishes the musical foundation, sorting the incoming signals and defining the quality and integrity of what reaches the power amp and speakers. The line-stage is the living, breathing heart of any system and you need to listen long and hard until you find the one for you.

This is, I grant you, not an opinion shared by everyone; many enthusiasts (including some on the Hi-Fi+ team) use systems without active line stages. However, I still hold that the best systems I’ve heard all feature an active preamp.

Rule 6. Don’t decide on a two-seater if you have a family

One of the biggest mistakes you can make when it comes to building a system is pre-allocating your budget, dividing it up by unit function – so much for the source component(s), so much for the amplifier and so much for the speakers. In reality, such an approach is utterly nonsensical. Not only will the relative component costs change with technology, but with overall budget too. End up with a horn speaker and it could cost many times the price of the driving amplifier – the complete opposite of a classic flat-earth pairing. Building a CD replay system or a record player are two completely different engineering problems with completely different cost structures: there’s no correlation between the expenditure on and performance of the two solutions – not to mention the fact that the record player needs a phono stage as well!

Finally, think back to our first three rules. Assembling a coherent set of cables and supports as well as executing the electrical work necessary doesn’t have to be massively expensive (at least in high-end audio terms) but there is a minimum cost involved. In the context of a £3,000 system that cost might well constitute as much as 50% of the budget – a figure that seems ludicrous on paper, until you actually listen to what these elements contribute to the overall sound. They aren’t just luxuries or accessories, they are the foundation on which the system is built and on which it’s performance depends. Although many disagree, I remain convinced that £1,500 worth of electronics and speakers properly set up with £1,500 worth of infrastructure, will out-perform £3,000 worth of kit set up on a sideboard using bell-wire!

Audio history is littered with examples of apparently mismatched systems that really worked. From the £2,000 ARC SP8 pre-amp driving the Meridian M2 interactive loudspeakers (£800 including the power amps) to the ARC M300 mono-blocs paired with the Sonus Faber Electa Amator, or from a quartet of Naim NAP135 power amps driving active Kans to the Border Patrol P21 driving the Vox Olympians, the proof is in the listening and you can only listen to a system – not individual components. Which is where audio and motoring diverge. The problem is, that when it comes to reproducing music, the simple measures (quicker, faster, further) don’t apply. What makes the difference between a set of equipment that just makes a noise, a good system that makes something approaching music and a great system that makes sense of both the music and the musical performance, is its ability to reveal the fragile chemistry preserved in the signal. Most people assume that the results are dictated by the quality of the boxes that make up the system, but in reality it has much more to do with how well the boxes work together and well you let them work.

As I said earlier, six rules aren’t a lot to follow and they won’t guarantee your arrival at audio nirvana – although they will set you on the right path and keep you heading in the right direction. But ignore even one and either you won’t have all the wheels on your hi-fi wagon, or you won’t get far before they start falling off: you set out to buy a Ferrari but you’ll end up with the audio equivalent of a Reliant Robin!

Visit Melco Lab

Midland Audio xchange present Industry veteran Alan Ainslie – who while responsible for Technics in the UK launched the Compact Disc at the start of the Digital Audio revolution, introduced the first ever CD cover mounts, pioneered synchronized audio distribution over Ethernet and introduced Naim Audio to streaming audio and multiroom, as well as consulting to manufacturers on all things digital and streaming. An evangelist for good recordings and fine music, is now taking IT devices and computers out of the Hi-Fi system to greatly simplify High Res Digital Audio playback and increase sound quality with the Melco Music library from Buffalo Technology.

It’s on from 10am unti 5pm on Saturday 21st of November call 01562731100 for your place

Postcards from Warsaw

“The Polish people love their audio!”

I kept hearing this from everyone who ever attended the Warsaw Audio Show. This year it was my turn, and I wasn’t disappointed. Just the stats show why this is such a key player: spread over three centres in the middle of Warsaw, the show takes place on the first full weekend in November, ends late in the evening on Friday and Saturday, gets more than 12,000 visitors, appears on national TV, and generally puts music on the map the way all traditional UK and US events don’t do anymore.

It’s not perfect – Polish people seem to love a warm room as much as their audio equipment, and the combination of 80°F heat in the room, a floor full of valve amps, and a room full of lots of sweaty men and women, made some of these rooms at the Radisson Blu hotel (one of the three venues) almost untenable. Also, by about midday, every room was stuffed to the gills with people crowded into rooms or booths (even in the hospitality suites of the National Stadium venue, which was across town), and many were simply inaccessible, for hours on end.

Worse, for a journalist who speaks no Polish, there were a lot of companies showing brands that are made in Poland, by Polish people, for Polish people, none of whom could speak a word of English. This could be considered an obstacle to complete a show report, because many of the products seen here could be ‘new’ or simply ‘new to us’. Even asking prices was an exercise in bad mime in some places.

Finally, to add insult to injury, this was the show where my flash chose to die, where almost every room was dark, and where people got very twitchy when you got too close to the products. So even the images are not up to our usual standard.

However, we’ve tried to give you a flavour of the show, in pictures rather than words…

This system – featuring an SME 15 turntable, CEC CD-3N CD player, RCM Theriaa phonostage, Einstein The Preamp and The Poweramp, and Audiomachina CRM II loudspeakers – was one of the best sounding at the show.

This last perhaps best describes the vibe of the Warsaw Show. This was a fairly typical – if slightly large – room at one of the hotels. Not a statement system, not the kind of system that forms a line of people wanting to tick off one of the ‘destination’ audio equipment, but good, well-sorted audio. But as in many rooms there were lots of people, lots of room treatment, and lots and lots of interest in audio.

The sound of seven million

Seven million for an audio system? OK, so it’s seven million Polish Zloty, which only works out at about $1.75m, but even so… it’s hardly chicken feed. This system was one of the highlights of this weekend’s Warsaw Audio Show, and comprised top of the range CEC transport with the finest Kondo Sound Labs can offer in terms of amplification and culminating in a pair of the vast Living Voice Vox Olympian horn loudspeakers met with the similarly huge Vox Elysian bass units.

The loudspeakers are custom made in the UK, take months to build, and end up employing a number of the best ‘lost art’ artisan woodworkers, metalworkers, cabinetmakers, and more. As a consequence, the build quality is off the scale. The Vox Olympian and Vox Elysian are a quiet success story, with an order book stretching far into the future (the burr walnut set were made for an owner who takes deliver after the show). Owning a set of Vox Olympians will set you back the wrong side of $400,000, and the Vox Elysian will cost a cool $250,000 or more. And yet if you ordered a pair today, you’d go on a very select list and receive your speakers probably in early 2017.

It’s our reactions to these little factoids that marks the difference between English-speaking audiophiles and our trans-national counterparts. It’s fairly impossible to mention a $400,000 loudspeaker without ‘kill the messenger’ style opprobrium, blaming Living Voice for everything from destroying the polar ice caps on down, and with that any one who dare mention the existence of such a device. Whereas in Poland, it was all over the local and national TV stations, with a ‘what must it be like?’ discussions. Seven times over, including at least one interview on national breakfast TV – can you imagine a million dollar system making it onto Good Morning America, or a million pound one making it on BBC Breakfast?

Those who attended the show seemed more than satisfied by the sound the system was making, and the large room was always full. This reflects the reaction to a very similar system that was played at Munich earlier this year.

And yet, this never seems to be reflected in reactions to price from forums, with people more concerned in expressing outrage in such profligate spending on audio. They ignore the idea that market forces and not neo-Stalinist proclamations drive what does and does not sell out there in the real world, and that if products like this thrive, then the skilled workers making these products thrive too.

Unless something truly life-changing happens, I will never be able to afford a pair of these Living Voice speakers, and especially not the speakers with the subs. I will never even be able to listen to them at home without some fairly awkward home rebuilding process. But I’m glad things like this exist. Not because they are rich people’s playthings, and not even because of the publicity they brought to the industry during the Warsaw Show. But because they show just what people are capable of doing. They push the envelope, or at least one of the envelopes.

That should deserve some praise, but I suspect the last line of this will be where the hatred begins…

Sonus faber Chameleon B standmount loudspeaker

Loudspeakers are great, but sometimes they don’t do ‘sexy’. There are still a lot of rectangular wooden ‘monkey coffins’ out there, virtually unchanged in basic design for more than two generations. Fortunately, there’s also Sonus faber.

The Chameleon is Sonus faber’s new entry-level range, effectively replacing the diminutive Toy models. The range comprises the Chameleon T (‘Tower’ floorstanders), the Chameleon C (for ‘Centre’), and the bookshelf Chameleon B, tested here. The B is a ported two-way design, with a 29mm fabric dome tweeter (without ferrofluid damping), and a 150mm polypropylene cone bass unit. There are broad similarities in design between the Chameleon and its predecessor; like the Toy, the Chameleon has a trapezoid side aspect, which gives the front baffle and back panel a distinct slope. The sloping front and back help break up internal standing waves, and also gives the loudspeaker a small degree of time alignment. Both the Toy and the Chameleon also feature a leather covered wooden cabinet. But the similarities end there.

The Toy, so very indicative of the new look of Sonus faber a few years ago, looks positively old-fashioned next to the Chameleon. The older speaker’s fixed wood or leather side-cheeks have given away to solid, interchangeable, colourful, and glossy side panels – six in total at the moment, with more said to follow. You get one set with the loudspeakers when you buy them, and can buy more at will, whether you want to change your mood or décor. I imagine most will initially opt for the black, white, or red options, but I can see people also getting more ambitious after a while and opting for orange or ‘metal blu’, or even some of the future options, like turquoise or vivid yellow. Theoretically, if you have enough sets of panels, you could create a palette of colours, with different colour panels on each side of each loudspeaker (although that could get expensive). Changing these side panels is quick and easy, as you can easily swap over a set in a couple of minutes. What’s more,the large push locators don’t rattle even when the speaker is played loud. The side panels have a small recess cut into one side to allow the “Sonus faber Italy” logos to show. And, because the side panels can fit either side, Sonus faber has included this logo to the front and rear of the sides of the loudspeaker, so there will always be a logo staring back at you, regardless of how you insert these panels.

I guess we should not be taken aback by this small, but significant, step change in product design, because Sonus faber has long relished its Italian style, creating some of the most elegant loudspeakers in the business. And, in great fairness, the idea of interchangeable colour panels is not exactly a new one; it’s not even a new idea in loudspeaker design. But Sonus faber is the first to take the concept beyond the lower ends of the audio world. These are more than interchangeable cheap plastic colour panels on a cheap plastic soundbar: the Chameleon is a credible loudspeaker in its own right, one that affords the listener considerable input in the ultimate design.

A clever touch here is the vent itself. A down-firing port (complete with permanently fixed foam bung) would normally be a problem with a standmount design, but Sonus faber has created a combination plinth and front-firing vent for the port that manages to look good, provide a mass-loaded base for the loudspeaker, and make the vent less room dependent. It’s one of those neat and simple solutions that constitute one of the distinctive features of the Chameleon B.

However, the one aspect of the Chameleon B’s design I’m not convinced by is the reintroduction of bi-wire terminals that doesn’t, I believe, significantly benefit a loudspeaker of this kind, even bi-amped (at least, it didn’t for a Roksan with integrated and power amp combo); a good, single wire terminal block should be better. This might be a trifle, but we all know what Michelangelo said about trifles: they make perfection.

When it comes to the sound quality of the Chameleon B, the loudspeaker also combines the modern and the classic presentations of Sonus faber in one, integrating elements of the Venere with those of the Minima standmounts. Consequently, the Chameleon is lyrical and beguiling like the Minima, but detailed and fast-paced like the Venere. This is a very good and very ‘now’ balance. It lends itself to contemporary classic tracks like ‘Royals’ by Lorde [Pure Heroine, Universal], giving the music a combination of room-filling vibrancy and soaring trebles.

It’s very clear, very quickly, that you are in the presence of good quality audiophile fare when you sit between the Chameleon B. The soundstaging in particular is open and expressive, with excellent width and depth, and even some height. The one thing small standmount speakers like the Sonus faber do exceptionally well, is they act like an effective point source. Play ‘Mi Buenos Aires Querido’ from the album of the same name by Daniel Barenboim, Rodolfo Mederos, and Héctor Console [Teldec], and you get the sense of a classically inspired Tango trio physically occupying your own room. Coupled with an overarching sense of refinement, and you have the sort of insightful and deeply enjoyable presentation you get from the best high-end audio. But with one reservation: bass.

The ‘B’ in ‘Chameleon B’ might stand for ‘bookshelf’, but it doesn’t stand for ‘bass’. The Sonus faber loudspeaker tries well to deliver good, taut bass, which is a lot better than faking it with boomy, woofly noises at around 80Hz, but while this honesty means you can follow a bass line, it doesn’t mean you can follow it very far. There is a gentle roll-off that kicks in at the upper bass, and by the time you get to the far left hand on a piano, the pedals on an organ, or the deepest, flubbiest bass lines from a dub album, those notes are present in homeopathic quantities. I actually prefer this to a loudspeaker that goes more for the ‘smoke and mirrors’ effect; the Chameleon B’s last few octaves are more akin to a LS3/5a design. Nevertheless, if your musical tastes demand full-on bass depth and solidity, look elsewhere.

The Chameleon B occupies ground held by no company before, and its potential owners will not be swayed by ‘non-design’ designs. Such design-led music lovers have often been fobbed off with poor sounding – but cool looking – loudspeakers. But here we get that rare thing: a loudspeaker that looks good, but which also sounds good enough to satisfy demanding listeners. Although there are loudspeakers that will prove more satisfying to those wanting deeper bass or a more taut or a more rhythmically integrated sound, I suspect that is missing the point entirely, because the Chameleon B is an exercise in reducing compromise across the board. Those who only care about how a loudspeaker sounds, and not how it looks, are never going to ‘get’ a loudspeaker like the Chameleon B, and will tend to dismiss a loudspeaker that has aesthetically pleasing component out of hand. But this is not mirrored in those wanting a more design-led loudspeaker. If many are as unwilling to sacrifice sound quality as they are aesthetic values, the Sonus faber Chameleon B is their next bookshelf loudspeaker.

Think of the Sonus faber Chameleon B as a ‘best of both worlds’ design. It combines old (wood and leather) and new (ABS and state of the art drivers) design, with performance. It is every bit a 2015 loudspeaker in looks and sound, but one that doesn’t shake off its heritage in the process. Our little audio world is hide-bound by those who forget a loudspeaker in a living room has to look good as well as sound good; for those that remember the importance of both, this important little loudspeaker comes highly recommended.

Technical Specifications

Type: Two-way vented box standmount loudspeaker
Driver compliment: 29 mm high definition precoated fabric dome tweeter with no ferrofluid. 1× 150 mm free compression basket woofer with polypropylene cone. Both custom Sonus faber designs
Frequency Response: 50Hz–25kHz
Crossover Point: 2.5kHz
Sensitivity: 87dB (2.831V/1M)
Nominal impedance: 4Ω
Suggested Amplifier power output: 30–150W (without clipping)
Dimensions (H×W×D): 32 × 19 × 28cm
Optional stand (H×W×D): 72 × 31 × 37cm
Weight (per loudspeaker): 6.7kg
Price: £700

Manufactured by: Sonus faber

URL: www.sonusfaber.com

Distributed in the UK by: Absolute Sounds

URL: www.absolutesounds.com

Tel: +44(0)208 971 3909

Back to reviews

Kiso Acoustics HB-X1 standmount loudspeaker

Some years ago, we had a pair of the fascinating Kiso Acoustics HB-1 (on their original stands) in for review. That review never came about – there was some behind-the-scenes dispute over those stands – but we did get to play them at one of the last Manchester audio shows to very great effect. The new HB-X1 builds and extends on what the HB-1 did, and we jumped at a chance to finally put one through its paces.

Kiso Acoustics is a Japanese company, a side-project if you like from the cartridge makers (and one-time preamp experts) Lyra, in association with visionary loudspeaker designer Toru Hara. It is a two-way ported standmount loudspeaker of diminutive stature, as it is about the height of a BBC-designed LS3/5a, but narrower, and this plus the sloping back means significantly less cabinet volume. The size of the speaker limits the size of the drive units in the loudspeaker, with a 17mm tweeter in a horn made from ebony, and a 100mm mid/bass unit. That’s 2/3^rds of an inch and just under four inches respectively! Despite these diminutive drivers, Kiso Acoustics claims a frequency response from 40Hz-30kHz.

Part of this extended (for so small a speaker) frequency response comes down to the cabinet. The cabinet itself is reminiscent of a guitar, and those with good audiophile memories might note this has been done before. Onkyo teamed up with Takamine to deliver the D-KT10 loudspeaker of 2007. This speaker shares the same designer, the same basic shape, and not much else. If you were to compare the HB-1 with HB-X1 from the Kiso stable, you’d find a very slightly larger base (7mm to be precise) and inside that base a crossover filled with high-grade Mundorf caps.

The ‘HB’ in the name is derived from the rōmanji Japanese word ‘hibiki’, which translates to ‘resonance’ (‘Hibiki’ is also the name of Suntory’s extremely nice blended whisky, and I have to confess that – before it became punishingly expensive to drink in the West – on occasion, I have been pleasantly ‘resonated’ on the stuff). This idea of ‘hibiki’ is fundamental to the design of both Kiso models (and the Onkyo design), in that the cabinet is designed to be actively resonant, rather than ‘dead’. The logic is that an acoustic musical instrument uses its resonant chamber to create its tonality, tonal colour, and (ultimately) volume. A perfect – and entirely apposite in this case – example of this is the sound-box of an acoustic guitar: Yamaha makes a range of ‘silent’ classical guitars, which have the head, nut, neck, bridge and tuning pegs of a nylon-strung guitar, but with the upper and lower bouts of the sound-box replaced with an open frame and a piezo-electric pick-up. Unless you plug this guitar into an amplifier, it is almost completely silent.

Why is this guitar analogy apposite in the Kiso HB designs? Because the enclosure of the cabinet is not only designed along the same basic lines as the upper bout of an acoustic guitar, but also built by guitar luthiers. Lyra’s side-project is also a side-project of Takamine’s custom shop, and the results speak for themselves in the flesh. If you weren’t lucky enough to see the HB-1 at our Manchester presentation, or have seen them demonstrated at another show, and want to know how refined the HB-X1 looks in real life, go to a prestige guitar shop, and ask the assistant to show you what they think is the most beautifully finished acoustic guitar they have irrespective of cost, and you should get an idea of what the Kiso is physically like. In short: it’s extremely pretty, in proportion, finish, and detail; and when the light hits it in the right way it’s almost painfully beautiful, in the way only a hand-crafted musical instrument can look.

The Kiso sits on eight little clear gel insulators, and ideally comes to rest on tall stands. This was the sticking point in the HB-1’s failure to make it to review – Kiso makes its own ‘Podium’ stands, but the preferred option is the Vibex HB-X1 stands, built by the Spanish distributor, which comprise two carbon-fibre tube uprights with metallised polymer ‘K-material’ top and baseplates. This results in a stand that is light, rigid, extremely inert, and very expensive. You could almost say the stand does to the Kiso what a guitarist does to the sound of an acoustic guitar; adding a rigidity and support to the soundbox without constraint.

The guitar-like enclosure of the Kiso is not simply for looks. It’s an intrinsic part of the design, and – unlike practically every loudspeaker you’ll ever try – the cabinet is actively resonant. This means at some point you will place your fingertips on the cabinet, like Mr. Spock attempting a mind-meld, while the music is playing. The feedback you get from this tactile joining is fascinating, as you can feel the resonance of the music move across the cabinet, dancing beneath your fingertips. It’s like you can feel the music being created, and not just hear it. Trying this with friends and industry types alike elicits a similar response through out; embarrassment at fondling a loudspeaker, followed by puzzlement, then the realisation of what’s happening, followed by the broad smile. It happened every time.

As befits a reviewer doing somewhat loony things in search of more words, I put in a set of earplugs in an attempt to actually ‘feel’ the music under my fingers using the Kisos; I could, but my proprioceptive language skills in this respect are not well developed, so I couldn’t actually ‘hear’ the music through my fingers. However, it makes you appreciate just how profoundly deaf musicians (Beethoven and Evelyn Glennie spring to mind) can still compose and play. My admiration for such people only increases at the attempt, though. Continuing to channel Mr. Spock… fascinating!

The Kiso speakers naturally require good upstream equipment, but more significantly they need to be placed farther than usual apart, and at least 40cm from the rear and side walls. Curiously, they spring to life in rooms far larger than you might expect given the size. This is one of the very clever aspects of the Kiso; that on-paper 40Hz seems impossible given the size of the loudspeaker, but in the right room, you’ll think it’s understatement and suspect the speaker goes deeper.

Ultimately, of course, a small loudspeaker has limits on what it can do, and the Kiso HB-X1 is no exception. It doesn’t break the laws of physics then, but it waterboards those laws a little so they give up their inner secrets. That said, bass is deep and potent, not simply for a loudspeaker this small or for on-paper measurements of this kind, but simply deep and potent. The Kiso relies on the simple fact that most acoustic music doesn’t have a monumental amount of energy in the sub-40Hz region, and what the Kiso delivers is enough for most people. In listening to Mitsuko Uchida playing Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No 30 in E [Philips], you hear the beauty of the playing and the delightful tone of the piano, and you barely notice that the last octave or so of the piano is less potent than the rest. And that’s because Beethoven didn’t write a great deal of that sonata with heavy left-hand action. In fact, you begin to look at music not in terms of the bass that’s missing, but more in terms of just how much bass goes into most music, and the true answer is actually ‘not that much’. OK, if you listen to a lot of organ music, dubstep, or heavy opera, the HB-X1 is off the shopping list, but if your musical tastes view these deep bass explorations as a little ‘showy’, then the Kiso might just be ideal. So, while fast-paced bass transients like ‘Chameleon’ by Trentmøller [The Last Resort, Poker Flat] fare surprisingly well, they do so by not triggering those cavernous sounds. But, probably if you are going to be a Kiso owner, that will not matter one iota. You are past that.

I think it’s the dynamic range that is so captivating in the Kiso HB-X1: more so than the almost point-source imaging, which should be the main point of the speakers. Yes, the loudspeakers image beautifully, but a lot of loudspeakers image beautifully. What’s rarer is a loudspeaker that has the kind of effortless dynamics that are normally found with horns (or the real deal). This is not even a volume ‘thing’, because although the Kiso goes loud for a small box, it’s not a headbanger. Instead, play some classic jazz – ‘Love For Sale’ on Somthin’ Else by Cannonball Adderley [Blue Note] – and the dynamic freedom just gives you a sense of musicians at the top of their game riffing off one another, rather than a cool rendition of a well-worn jazz staple.

There’s one aspect of the Kiso sound that sets it apart from so much audio: it’s believable sounding. This transcends any breakdown of the music into its component parts and instead focuses on the music as an organic whole. But where other loudspeakers have some kind of coherence, the Kiso has more, and it really only can be called ‘believable’. This is an uncanny aspect of the loudspeakers, and it manifests in a peculiar – but oh so predictable – manner. The listener sits in front of the loudspeakers, liking what they hear, then turns away, and almost immediately performs a comedy double-take. A kind of ‘huh?’ moment as they hear the size, scale, and believability of the loudspeakers, only recently divorced from the physical size of the loudspeakers. I’ve seen people take four or five attempts to leave a room where the Kiso HB-1 or X1 is playing, each time turning away from the loudspeaker, only to turn back to listen to those real and believable sounds.

Once again, this believable sound tends to be heard with acoustic material rather than powerful rock or electronica – but there are a lot of speakers bigger and (on paper, at least) better than the HB-X1 in terms of frequency response and headroom, but in terms of sheer tone, of the ability to sit for long periods listening to these loudspeakers, and that abject sense of sublime musical communication from one instrument to another, the HB-X1 can’t be beat, no matter how big or how expensive the loudspeaker.

The Kiso HB-X1 is the point where reviews run out of road, and personal, individual listening becomes uppermost. The person who has never heard the Kiso will stumble at the price tag, no matter how purple the prose about how it sounds. However, the person who has heard the Kiso will stumble at how a speaker the size of the HB-X1 does what it does. Both will probably swear about the price, but where the former will decry such a speaker on moral grounds, the one who has heard it will be swearing about the deep hole the Kiso will make in their bank account.

It’s hard to write about the HB-X1 without making the loudspeaker sound flawed. It’s expensive, it doesn’t plumb the bass depths, it only comes in the one finish, it won’t play at high output, and it breaks every rule in the loudspeaker cookbook. And yet, listening to the Kiso, it dawns on you that none of those things matter. This is the kind of loudspeaker that does one thing (the small speaker that doesn’t sound small) well, but it just happens to do that one better than every other loudspeaker on the planet, and the more you listen, the more you are drawn into how the Kiso plays music.

The Kiso Acoustics HB-X1 is always going to be a niche product. It’s a small speaker for a big room that sounds like a much bigger speaker, and many will just buy a bigger speaker instead. But not everyone: some want big speaker sound without big speakers, and are prepared to pay big speaker money for the best small speakers they can get. And, they are exactly the people who will be seduced by the utterly captivating, utterly believable sound. Through the Kiso speakers, If You Can Believe Your Eyes and Ears is more than just an album by The Mamas and the Papas!

Technical Specifications

Type: Two-way bass reflex loudspeaker
Drive units: 1× 17mm wood horn tweeter, carved from ebony, 100cm cone
Rated impedance: 8Ω
Rated sensitivity: 85dB/W/m
Rated frequency range: 40Hz–30kHz
Crossover frequency: 5kHz
Dimensions (W×H×D): 15×32×22cm
Weight: 5.2kg per speaker
Price: £14,795 per pair. Stands £1,795 per pair
Manufactured by: Kiso Acoustic Co. Ltd

URL: www.kisoacoustic.com

Distributed by: Symmetry

URL: www.symmetry-systems.co.uk

Tel: +44(0)1727 865488

Back to reviews

Details

Manufactured by: Nordost

Distributed in the UK by: Atacama Audio

Technical Specifications

Manufactured by: Burmester Audiosysteme GmbH

Technical Specifications

Manufactured by: Stillpoints

Distributed by: Kog Audio

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Manufacturer Information: YG Acoustics LLC, 4941 Allison St. Unit 10, Arvada, CO 80002 U.S.A.

Distributor Information: Padood Ltd., CBI Business Centre, Twenty Station Rd., Cambridge, UK CBI 2JD

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Manufacturer Information: PS Audio

Distributor Information: Signature Audio Systems

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

UK Distributor: Sound Fowndations

US Distributor: GamuT USA

Technical Specifications

Manufactured by: Sonus faber

Distributed in the UK by: Absolute Sounds

Technical Specifications

URL: www.kisoacoustic.com

Distributed by: Symmetry

URL: www.symmetry-systems.co.uk

The sound of excellence delivered your way