Up to 37% in savings when you subscribe to hi-fi+
hifi-logo-footer

Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Postcards from Warsaw

“The Polish people love their audio!”

I kept hearing this from everyone who ever attended the Warsaw Audio Show. This year it was my turn, and I wasn’t disappointed. Just the stats show why this is such a key player: spread over three centres in the middle of Warsaw, the show takes place on the first full weekend in November, ends late in the evening on Friday and Saturday, gets more than 12,000 visitors, appears on national TV, and generally puts music on the map the way all traditional UK and US events don’t do anymore.

It’s not perfect – Polish people seem to love a warm room as much as their audio equipment, and the combination of 80°F heat in the room, a floor full of valve amps, and a room full of lots of sweaty men and women, made some of these rooms at the Radisson Blu hotel (one of the three venues) almost untenable. Also, by about midday, every room was stuffed to the gills with people crowded into rooms or booths (even in the hospitality suites of the National Stadium venue, which was across town), and many were simply inaccessible, for hours on end. 

Worse, for a journalist who speaks no Polish, there were a lot of companies showing brands that are made in Poland, by Polish people, for Polish people, none of whom could speak a word of English. This could be considered an obstacle to complete a show report, because many of the products seen here could be ‘new’ or simply ‘new to us’. Even asking prices was an exercise in bad mime in some places. 

Finally, to add insult to injury, this was the show where my flash chose to die, where almost every room was dark, and where people got very twitchy when you got too close to the products. So even the images are not up to our usual standard.

However, we’ve tried to give you a flavour of the show, in pictures rather than words…

 

 

 

This system – featuring an SME 15 turntable, CEC CD-3N CD player, RCM Theriaa phonostage, Einstein The Preamp and The Poweramp, and Audiomachina CRM II loudspeakers – was one of the best sounding at the show. 

This last perhaps best describes the vibe of the Warsaw Show. This was a fairly typical – if slightly large – room at one of the hotels. Not a statement system, not the kind of system that forms a line of people wanting to tick off one of the ‘destination’ audio equipment, but good, well-sorted audio. But as in many rooms there were lots of people, lots of room treatment, and lots and lots of interest in audio.

The sound of seven million

Seven million for an audio system? OK, so it’s seven million Polish Zloty, which only works out at about $1.75m, but even so… it’s hardly chicken feed. This system was one of the highlights of this weekend’s Warsaw Audio Show, and comprised top of the range CEC transport with the finest Kondo Sound Labs can offer in terms of amplification and culminating in a pair of the vast Living Voice Vox Olympian horn loudspeakers met with the similarly huge Vox Elysian bass units.

The loudspeakers are custom made in the UK, take months to build, and end up employing a number of the best ‘lost art’ artisan woodworkers, metalworkers, cabinetmakers, and more. As a consequence, the build quality is off the scale. The Vox Olympian and Vox Elysian are a quiet success story, with an order book stretching far into the future (the burr walnut set were made for an owner who takes deliver after the show). Owning a set of Vox Olympians will set you back the wrong side of $400,000, and the Vox Elysian will cost a cool $250,000 or more. And yet if you ordered a pair today, you’d go on a very select list and receive your speakers probably in early 2017.

It’s our reactions to these little factoids that marks the difference between English-speaking audiophiles and our trans-national counterparts. It’s fairly impossible to mention a $400,000 loudspeaker without ‘kill the messenger’ style opprobrium, blaming Living Voice for everything from destroying the polar ice caps on down, and with that any one who dare mention the existence of such a device. Whereas in Poland, it was all over the local and national TV stations, with a ‘what must it be like?’ discussions. Seven times over, including at least one interview on national breakfast TV – can you imagine a million dollar system making it onto Good Morning America, or a million pound one making it on BBC Breakfast?

Those who attended the show seemed more than satisfied by the sound the system was making, and the large room was always full. This reflects the reaction to a very similar system that was played at Munich earlier this year.

And yet, this never seems to be reflected in reactions to price from forums, with people more concerned in expressing outrage in such profligate spending on audio. They ignore the idea that market forces and not neo-Stalinist proclamations drive what does and does not sell out there in the real world, and that if products like this thrive, then the skilled workers making these products thrive too.

Unless something truly life-changing happens, I will never be able to afford a pair of these Living Voice speakers, and especially not the speakers with the subs. I will never even be able to listen to them at home without some fairly awkward home rebuilding process. But I’m glad things like this exist. Not because they are rich people’s playthings, and not even because of the publicity they brought to the industry during the Warsaw Show. But because they show just what people are capable of doing. They push the envelope, or at least one of the envelopes.

That should deserve some praise, but I suspect the last line of this will be where the hatred begins… 

Sonus faber Chameleon B standmount loudspeaker

Loudspeakers are great, but sometimes they don’t do ‘sexy’. There are still a lot of rectangular wooden ‘monkey coffins’ out there, virtually unchanged in basic design for more than two generations. Fortunately, there’s also Sonus faber.

The Chameleon is Sonus faber’s new entry-level range, effectively replacing the diminutive Toy models. The range comprises the Chameleon T (‘Tower’ floorstanders), the Chameleon C (for ‘Centre’), and the bookshelf Chameleon B, tested here. The B is a ported two-way design, with a 29mm fabric dome tweeter (without ferrofluid damping), and a 150mm polypropylene cone bass unit. There are broad similarities in design between the Chameleon and its predecessor; like the Toy, the Chameleon has a trapezoid side aspect, which gives the front baffle and back panel a distinct slope. The sloping front and back help break up internal standing waves, and also gives the loudspeaker a small degree of time alignment. Both the Toy and the Chameleon also feature a leather covered wooden cabinet. But the similarities end there.

The Toy, so very indicative of the new look of Sonus faber a few years ago, looks positively old-fashioned next to the Chameleon. The older speaker’s fixed wood or leather side-cheeks have given away to solid, interchangeable, colourful, and glossy side panels – six in total at the moment, with more said to follow. You get one set with the loudspeakers when you buy them, and can buy more at will, whether you want to change your mood or décor. I imagine most will initially opt for the black, white, or red options, but I can see people also getting more ambitious after a while and opting for orange or ‘metal blu’, or even some of the future options, like turquoise or vivid yellow. Theoretically, if you have enough sets of panels, you could create a palette of colours, with different colour panels on each side of each loudspeaker (although that could get expensive). Changing these side panels is quick and easy, as you can easily swap over a set in a couple of minutes. What’s more,the large push locators don’t rattle even when the speaker is played loud. The side panels have a small recess cut into one side to allow the “Sonus faber Italy” logos to show. And, because the side panels can fit either side, Sonus faber has included this logo to the front and rear of the sides of the loudspeaker, so there will always be a logo staring back at you, regardless of how you insert these panels.

I guess we should not be taken aback by this small, but significant, step change in product design, because Sonus faber has long relished its Italian style, creating some of the most elegant loudspeakers in the business. And, in great fairness, the idea of interchangeable colour panels is not exactly a new one; it’s not even a new idea in loudspeaker design. But Sonus faber is the first to take the concept beyond the lower ends of the audio world. These are more than interchangeable cheap plastic colour panels on a cheap plastic soundbar: the Chameleon is a credible loudspeaker in its own right, one that affords the listener considerable input in the ultimate design.

 

A clever touch here is the vent itself. A down-firing port (complete with permanently fixed foam bung) would normally be a problem with a standmount design, but Sonus faber has created a combination plinth and front-firing vent for the port that manages to look good, provide a mass-loaded base for the loudspeaker, and make the vent less room dependent. It’s one of those neat and simple solutions that constitute one of the distinctive features of the Chameleon B.

However, the one aspect of the Chameleon B’s design I’m not convinced by is the reintroduction of bi-wire terminals that doesn’t, I believe, significantly benefit a loudspeaker of this kind, even bi-amped (at least, it didn’t for a Roksan with integrated and power amp combo); a good, single wire terminal block should be better. This might be a trifle, but we all know what Michelangelo said about trifles: they make perfection.

When it comes to the sound quality of the Chameleon B, the loudspeaker also combines the modern and the classic presentations of Sonus faber in one, integrating elements of the Venere with those of the Minima standmounts. Consequently, the Chameleon is lyrical and beguiling like the Minima, but detailed and fast-paced like the Venere. This is a very good and very ‘now’ balance. It lends itself to contemporary classic tracks like ‘Royals’ by Lorde [Pure Heroine, Universal], giving the music a combination of room-filling vibrancy and soaring trebles.

It’s very clear, very quickly, that you are in the presence of good quality audiophile fare when you sit between the Chameleon B. The soundstaging in particular is open and expressive, with excellent width and depth, and even some height. The one thing small standmount speakers like the Sonus faber do exceptionally well, is they act like an effective point source. Play ‘Mi Buenos Aires Querido’ from the album of the same name by Daniel Barenboim, Rodolfo Mederos, and Héctor Console [Teldec], and you get the sense of a classically inspired Tango trio physically occupying your own room. Coupled with an overarching sense of refinement, and you have the sort of insightful and deeply enjoyable presentation you get from the best high-end audio. But with one reservation: bass.

The ‘B’ in ‘Chameleon B’ might stand for ‘bookshelf’, but it doesn’t stand for ‘bass’. The Sonus faber loudspeaker tries well to deliver good, taut bass, which is a lot better than faking it with boomy, woofly noises at around 80Hz, but while this honesty means you can follow a bass line, it doesn’t mean you can follow it very far. There is a gentle roll-off that kicks in at the upper bass, and by the time you get to the far left hand on a piano, the pedals on an organ, or the deepest, flubbiest bass lines from a dub album, those notes are present in homeopathic quantities. I actually prefer this to a loudspeaker that goes more for the ‘smoke and mirrors’ effect; the Chameleon B’s last few octaves are more akin to a LS3/5a design. Nevertheless, if your musical tastes demand full-on bass depth and solidity, look elsewhere.

 

The Chameleon B occupies ground held by no company before, and its potential owners will not be swayed by ‘non-design’ designs. Such design-led music lovers have often been fobbed off with poor sounding – but cool looking – loudspeakers. But here we get that rare thing: a loudspeaker that looks good, but which also sounds good enough to satisfy demanding listeners. Although there are loudspeakers that will prove more satisfying to those wanting deeper bass or a more taut or a more rhythmically integrated sound, I suspect that is missing the point entirely, because the Chameleon B is an exercise in reducing compromise across the board. Those who only care about how a loudspeaker sounds, and not how it looks, are never going to ‘get’ a loudspeaker like the Chameleon B, and will tend to dismiss a loudspeaker that has aesthetically pleasing component out of hand. But this is not mirrored in those wanting a more design-led loudspeaker. If many are as unwilling to sacrifice sound quality as they are aesthetic values, the Sonus faber Chameleon B is their next bookshelf loudspeaker.

Think of the Sonus faber Chameleon B as a ‘best of both worlds’ design. It combines old (wood and leather) and new (ABS and state of the art drivers) design, with performance. It is every bit a 2015 loudspeaker in looks and sound, but one that doesn’t shake off its heritage in the process. Our little audio world is hide-bound by those who forget a loudspeaker in a living room has to look good as well as sound good; for those that remember the importance of both, this important little loudspeaker comes highly recommended.

Technical Specifications

  • Type: Two-way vented box standmount loudspeaker
  • Driver compliment: 29 mm high definition precoated fabric dome tweeter with no ferrofluid. 1× 150 mm free compression basket woofer with polypropylene cone. Both custom Sonus faber designs
  • Frequency Response: 50Hz–25kHz
  • Crossover Point: 2.5kHz
  • Sensitivity: 87dB (2.831V/1M)
  • Nominal impedance:
  • Suggested Amplifier power output: 30–150W (without clipping)
  • Dimensions (H×W×D): 32 × 19 × 28cm
  • Optional stand (H×W×D): 72 × 31 × 37cm
  • Weight (per loudspeaker): 6.7kg
  • Price: £700

Manufactured by: Sonus faber

URL: www.sonusfaber.com

Distributed in the UK by: Absolute Sounds

URL: www.absolutesounds.com

Tel: +44(0)208 971 3909

Back to reviews

Read more Sonus faber reviews here

Kiso Acoustics HB-X1 standmount loudspeaker

Some years ago, we had a pair of the fascinating Kiso Acoustics HB-1 (on their original stands) in for review. That review never came about – there was some behind-the-scenes dispute over those stands – but we did get to play them at one of the last Manchester audio shows to very great effect. The new HB-X1 builds and extends on what the HB-1 did, and we jumped at a chance to finally put one through its paces.

Kiso Acoustics is a Japanese company, a side-project if you like from the cartridge makers (and one-time preamp experts) Lyra, in association with visionary loudspeaker designer Toru Hara. It is a two-way ported standmount loudspeaker of diminutive stature, as it is about the height of a BBC-designed LS3/5a, but narrower, and this plus the sloping back means significantly less cabinet volume. The size of the speaker limits the size of the drive units in the loudspeaker, with a 17mm tweeter in a horn made from ebony, and a 100mm mid/bass unit. That’s 2/3rds of an inch and just under four inches respectively! Despite these diminutive drivers, Kiso Acoustics claims a frequency response from 40Hz-30kHz.

Part of this extended (for so small a speaker) frequency response comes down to the cabinet. The cabinet itself is reminiscent of a guitar, and those with good audiophile memories might note this has been done before. Onkyo teamed up with Takamine to deliver the D-KT10 loudspeaker of 2007. This speaker shares the same designer, the same basic shape, and not much else. If you were to compare the HB-1 with HB-X1 from the Kiso stable, you’d find a very slightly larger base (7mm to be precise) and inside that base a crossover filled with high-grade Mundorf caps.

The ‘HB’ in the name is derived from the rōmanji Japanese word ‘hibiki’, which translates to ‘resonance’ (‘Hibiki’ is also the name of Suntory’s extremely nice blended whisky, and I have to confess that – before it became punishingly expensive to drink in the West – on occasion, I have been pleasantly ‘resonated’ on the stuff). This idea of ‘hibiki’ is fundamental to the design of both Kiso models (and the Onkyo design), in that the cabinet is designed to be actively resonant, rather than ‘dead’. The logic is that an acoustic musical instrument uses its resonant chamber to create its tonality, tonal colour, and (ultimately) volume. A perfect – and entirely apposite in this case – example of this is the sound-box of an acoustic guitar: Yamaha makes a range of ‘silent’ classical guitars, which have the head, nut, neck, bridge and tuning pegs of a nylon-strung guitar, but with the upper and lower bouts of the sound-box replaced with an open frame and a piezo-electric pick-up. Unless you plug this guitar into an amplifier, it is almost completely silent.

 

Why is this guitar analogy apposite in the Kiso HB designs? Because the enclosure of the cabinet is not only designed along the same basic lines as the upper bout of an acoustic guitar, but also built by guitar luthiers. Lyra’s side-project is also a side-project of Takamine’s custom shop, and the results speak for themselves in the flesh. If you weren’t lucky enough to see the HB-1 at our Manchester presentation, or have seen them demonstrated at another show, and want to know how refined the HB-X1 looks in real life, go to a prestige guitar shop, and ask the assistant to show you what they think is the most beautifully finished acoustic guitar they have irrespective of cost, and you should get an idea of what the Kiso is physically like. In short: it’s extremely pretty, in proportion, finish, and detail; and when the light hits it in the right way it’s almost painfully beautiful, in the way only a hand-crafted musical instrument can look.

The Kiso sits on eight little clear gel insulators, and ideally comes to rest on tall stands. This was the sticking point in the HB-1’s failure to make it to review – Kiso makes its own ‘Podium’ stands, but the preferred option is the Vibex HB-X1 stands, built by the Spanish distributor, which comprise two carbon-fibre tube uprights with metallised polymer ‘K-material’ top and baseplates. This results in a stand that is light, rigid, extremely inert, and very expensive. You could almost say the stand does to the Kiso what a guitarist does to the sound of an acoustic guitar; adding a rigidity and support to the soundbox without constraint.

The guitar-like enclosure of the Kiso is not simply for looks. It’s an intrinsic part of the design, and – unlike practically every loudspeaker you’ll ever try – the cabinet is actively resonant. This means at some point you will place your fingertips on the cabinet, like Mr. Spock attempting a mind-meld, while the music is playing. The feedback you get from this tactile joining is fascinating, as you can feel the resonance of the music move across the cabinet, dancing beneath your fingertips. It’s like you can feel the music being created, and not just hear it. Trying this with friends and industry types alike elicits a similar response through out; embarrassment at fondling a loudspeaker, followed by puzzlement, then the realisation of what’s happening, followed by the broad smile. It happened every time.

As befits a reviewer doing somewhat loony things in search of more words, I put in a set of earplugs in an attempt to actually ‘feel’ the music under my fingers using the Kisos; I could, but my proprioceptive language skills in this respect are not well developed, so I couldn’t actually ‘hear’ the music through my fingers. However, it makes you appreciate just how profoundly deaf musicians (Beethoven and Evelyn Glennie spring to mind) can still compose and play. My admiration for such people only increases at the attempt, though. Continuing to channel Mr. Spock… fascinating!

The Kiso speakers naturally require good upstream equipment, but more significantly they need to be placed farther than usual apart, and at least 40cm from the rear and side walls. Curiously, they spring to life in rooms far larger than you might expect given the size. This is one of the very clever aspects of the Kiso; that on-paper 40Hz seems impossible given the size of the loudspeaker, but in the right room, you’ll think it’s understatement and suspect the speaker goes deeper.

 

Ultimately, of course, a small loudspeaker has limits on what it can do, and the Kiso HB-X1 is no exception. It doesn’t break the laws of physics then, but it waterboards those laws a little so they give up their inner secrets. That said, bass is deep and potent, not simply for a loudspeaker this small or for on-paper measurements of this kind, but simply deep and potent. The Kiso relies on the simple fact that most acoustic music doesn’t have a monumental amount of energy in the sub-40Hz region, and what the Kiso delivers is enough for most people. In listening to Mitsuko Uchida playing Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No 30 in E [Philips], you hear the beauty of the playing and the delightful tone of the piano, and you barely notice that the last octave or so of the piano is less potent than the rest. And that’s because Beethoven didn’t write a great deal of that sonata with heavy left-hand action. In fact, you begin to look at music not in terms of the bass that’s missing, but more in terms of just how much bass goes into most music, and the true answer is actually ‘not that much’. OK, if you listen to a lot of organ music, dubstep, or heavy opera, the HB-X1 is off the shopping list, but if your musical tastes view these deep bass explorations as a little ‘showy’, then the Kiso might just be ideal. So, while fast-paced bass transients like ‘Chameleon’ by Trentmøller [The Last Resort, Poker Flat] fare surprisingly well, they do so by not triggering those cavernous sounds. But, probably if you are going to be a Kiso owner, that will not matter one iota. You are past that.

I think it’s the dynamic range that is so captivating in the Kiso HB-X1: more so than the almost point-source imaging, which should be the main point of the speakers. Yes, the loudspeakers image beautifully, but a lot of loudspeakers image beautifully. What’s rarer is a loudspeaker that has the kind of effortless dynamics that are normally found with horns (or the real deal). This is not even a volume ‘thing’, because although the Kiso goes loud for a small box, it’s not a headbanger. Instead, play some classic jazz – ‘Love For Sale’ on Somthin’ Else by Cannonball Adderley [Blue Note] – and the dynamic freedom just gives you a sense of musicians at the top of their game riffing off one another, rather than a cool rendition of a well-worn jazz staple.

There’s one aspect of the Kiso sound that sets it apart from so much audio: it’s believable sounding. This transcends any breakdown of the music into its component parts and instead focuses on the music as an organic whole. But where other loudspeakers have some kind of coherence, the Kiso has more, and it really only can be called ‘believable’. This is an uncanny aspect of the loudspeakers, and it manifests in a peculiar – but oh so predictable – manner. The listener sits in front of the loudspeakers, liking what they hear, then turns away, and almost immediately performs a comedy double-take. A kind of ‘huh?’ moment as they hear the size, scale, and believability of the loudspeakers, only recently divorced from the physical size of the loudspeakers. I’ve seen people take four or five attempts to leave a room where the Kiso HB-1 or X1 is playing, each time turning away from the loudspeaker, only to turn back to listen to those real and believable sounds.

Once again, this believable sound tends to be heard with acoustic material rather than powerful rock or electronica – but there are a lot of speakers bigger and (on paper, at least) better than the HB-X1 in terms of frequency response and headroom, but in terms of sheer tone, of the ability to sit for long periods listening to these loudspeakers, and that abject sense of sublime musical communication from one instrument to another, the HB-X1 can’t be beat, no matter how big or how expensive the loudspeaker.

The Kiso HB-X1 is the point where reviews run out of road, and personal, individual listening becomes uppermost. The person who has never heard the Kiso will stumble at the price tag, no matter how purple the prose about how it sounds. However, the person who has heard the Kiso will stumble at how a speaker the size of the HB-X1 does what it does. Both will probably swear about the price, but where the former will decry such a speaker on moral grounds, the one who has heard it will be swearing about the deep hole the Kiso will make in their bank account.

 

It’s hard to write about the HB-X1 without making the loudspeaker sound flawed. It’s expensive, it doesn’t plumb the bass depths, it only comes in the one finish, it won’t play at high output, and it breaks every rule in the loudspeaker cookbook. And yet, listening to the Kiso, it dawns on you that none of those things matter. This is the kind of loudspeaker that does one thing (the small speaker that doesn’t sound small) well, but it just happens to do that one better than every other loudspeaker on the planet, and the more you listen, the more you are drawn into how the Kiso plays music.

The Kiso Acoustics HB-X1 is always going to be a niche product. It’s a small speaker for a big room that sounds like a much bigger speaker, and many will just buy a bigger speaker instead. But not everyone: some want big speaker sound without big speakers, and are prepared to pay big speaker money for the best small speakers they can get. And, they are exactly the people who will be seduced by the utterly captivating, utterly believable sound. Through the Kiso speakers, If You Can Believe Your Eyes and Ears is more than just an album by The Mamas and the Papas!

Technical Specifications

  • Type: Two-way bass reflex loudspeaker
  • Drive units: 1× 17mm wood horn tweeter, carved from ebony, 100cm cone
  • Rated impedance:
  • Rated sensitivity: 85dB/W/m
  • Rated frequency range: 40Hz–30kHz
  • Crossover frequency: 5kHz
  • Dimensions (W×H×D): 15×32×22cm
  • Weight: 5.2kg per speaker
  • Price: £14,795 per pair. Stands £1,795 per pair
  • Manufactured by: Kiso Acoustic Co. Ltd

URL: www.kisoacoustic.com

Distributed by: Symmetry

URL: www.symmetry-systems.co.uk

Tel: +44(0)1727 865488

Back to reviews

Read more Kiso Acoustics reviews here

WIN! Mad Scientist YANAM and ATOH Interconnect Cables must be won!!!

Auckland based Mad Scientist Audio is just about to release a major new series of three innovative and unique types of interconnects. The new trio of cables all use treated carbon-fibre bundles in the signal conductors, with differing kinds of earth conductors featuring a range of copper and silver OCC wire and foils. We have teamed up with Mad Scientist Audio again, this time to give away two prizes. First prize will be a YANAM (You and the Night and the Music) interconnect, which uses silver and copper OCC wire and copper foil earth worth NZ$549 and second prize will be ATOH (A Taste of Honey) interconnect worth NZ$299 (with copper OCC earth). Look out for a review of YANAM in a forthcoming issue of Hi-Fi+.As always with Mad Scientist Audio, carbon fibre was chosen as a result of a series of painstaking trials. Two dozen different wire types were put to test, as signal conductor and earth conductor, before carbon fibre was selected. 

Competition Question

What material does each interconnect use for its signal conductors?

A. Carbon Fibre bundles

B. Individual strands of depleted uranium

C. Teflon coated rhodium

To answer, please visit Mad Scientist Audio’s dedicated competition page at http://www.madscientist-audio.com/yanamcomp.html Alternatively, send your answer on a postcard (including your name, address, and contact details) to “Mad Scientist Competition, Mad Scientist Audio Ltd, 1 Ellivani Rise, Pukekohe, Auckland 2120, New Zealand”. The competition closes on January, 7th 2016.

Competition Rules

The competition will run from November, 5 2015 until January, 7 2016. The competition is open to everyone, but multiple, automated or bulk entries will be disqualified. The winner will be chosen at random from all valid entries, will be contacted via email (where possible) and their name will be published in the magazine. The Editor’s decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into. Absolute Multimedia (UK) Ltd. is compliant with the Data Protection Act and UK laws apply. Our policy is such that we will not pass on your details to any third party without your prior consent.

WIN! A pair of Red Russell K Red 100 loudspeakers worth £1,250 must be won!!!

Regular readers of Hi‑Fi+ will remember we ran a competition in our March issue (Issue 121), where one lucky reader won a black pair of Russell K Red 100’s. Due to an unprecedented number of entries we received, we have teamed up again with our good friends at Russell K to give away another pair of Red 100s, this time in its striking red livery. Our Editor, Alan Sircom, reviewed the Red 100 in issue 119, and was so impressed with these 10kg speakers that he concluded “The Red 100 is a good speaker, but more importantly it’s a good idea, and they are rare. Not an easy speaker to classify in audio terms, but highly recommended, and fabulous value to boot”.

Competition Question

How much does a Red 100 weigh?

A. 10kg

B. 50kg

C. 100kg

To answer, please visit Russell K’s dedicated competition page at http://russellk.co.uk/competition.php 

Alternatively, send your answer on a postcard (including your name, address, and contact details) to “Russell K Red 100 competition, Russell K Ltd, Wentworth House, 81-83 High Street North, Dunstable, Beds, LU6 1JJ”.

The competition closes on January, 7th 2016.

Competition Rules

The competition will run from November, 5 2015 until anuary, 7 2016. The competition is open to everyone, but multiple, automated or bulk entries will be disqualified. The winner will be chosen at random from all valid entries, will be contacted via email (where possible) and their name will be published in the magazine. The Editor’s decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into. Absolute Multimedia (UK) Ltd. is compliant with the Data Protection Act and UK laws apply. Our policy is such that we will not pass on your details to any third party without your prior consent.                 

Focal Sphear earphones

The name is a play on words, and torture on a spell-checker. Focal’s Sphear earphones are ‘SPHerical’ in shape, they follow Focal’s ‘SPirit of Sound’ concept, you ‘HEAR’ good sounds through them, and they go in the ‘EAR’. Hence ‘Sphear’. And yes, I did play Burning Spear through them. Well, it was either that or Spear of Destiny.

Focal has been making headphones for several years, joining the steady stream of loudspeaker manufacturers putting their acoustical nous to the in-head world. But Sphear is the company’s first thrust (see what I did there?) into the universal-fit earphone market, and it has priced Sphear very aggressively, at £100. It has also recognised that universal-fit earphones at this level (as in, not custom-fit models) are more commonly used on the move, so Sphear is an easy 16Ω load and, at 103dB, efficient enough to run well from iThings and Androids. Sphear also includes an omni-directional microphone for calls.

The company is said to have spent two years developing Sphear; not simply for sound, but because Focal suggested most earphones are not built for comfort. I tend to agree – being contrary, one of my ear canals is ‘dinky’ and the other ‘kinky’, and finding off-the-shelf earphones that fit both equally well can be difficult (RHA scores well for me, here). Focal seems to have addressed this problem well, and Sphear sits comfortably in both ears without long-term stress or strain. The box comes complete with silicone and Comply-style memory foam tips for small, medium, and large ears, so it is taking care to provide a good array of options for listener sound and comfort (from personal experience, my advice here is don’t just assume your ears have the same S, M, or L fit, and you may find one lug ‘ole slightly larger than the other).

Focal also claims to have built Sphear in a manner akin to a loudspeaker, albeit one with a single, 10.8mm electrodynamic drive unit sitting in the matt-black ABS housing. It is a bass reflex design, with the port rear-firing into the stainless-steel outer ring and grille. A gloss black acoustic chamber sits in the ear, with a one-piece port that enters the ear canal (covered by an appropriate tip). There is an in-line microphone on the left channel and the two channels meet in a custom Y-connector that has touch-sensors for phone and music controls, and is shaped to look like one of Sphear’s earpieces, and there’s a metre of cable between that and 45° entry mini TRS jack. I would prefer the cables to be slightly more no-tangle than supplied. Anatomically speaking, the bulk of the outside of Sphear is designed to fit in the concha of the outer ear without resting on the crus helix, with the yoke of the cable outlet fitting between the tragus and antitragus. In other words, it is shaped to fit the ear, but doesn’t press against any of parts of the outer ear. Clever.

Along with the ear-tips, Sphear also comes with a small zip-up clamshell case, and an adaptor for double-jack in flight mode. Tellingly, it does not include a full-sized jack-plug, emphasising the ‘on the move’ aspects of the design. In sum, Sphear is an elegant and extremely comfortable design, and well executed for the money.

 

If you ever wanted to dispel the notion that earphones don’t need running in, give the sceptic a pair of new Focal Sphears, and check back after a few days of constant playtime. Their balance doesn’t change particularly, but the way that tonal balance integrates is completely different. Sphear has been designed to deliver bass that cuts through the noise of the outside world, and when new out the box, that bass is dominant and wayward. A week later, it still has a distinct ‘muscular’ bass emphasis, but now that bass is integrated, controlled, and even taut.

As described earlier, naturally this was time for some Burning Spear [Marcus Garvey/Garvey’s Ghost, Hip-O/Island]. The first play (a few hours into the run-in process) was disappointing. Where was this cornerstone of 1970s reggae? It sounded slightly like a tribute act was mangling the album. A few days later, and order was restored; the bass could be nodded along to in that lazy way you do when listening to good reggae and fine dub. The sound was deep, mean, growling, and visceral. The kind of bass you can get your teeth into. This is never going to be a bass-light earphone, but once run in, the bass doesn’t impose itself when not called upon to do so.

Away from the bass, Sphear has an extremely enjoyable tonal balance, with a distinct absence of anything hard, or harsh in the top end. Once more, the running-in process fills in a slight thinness in the midrange over the course of a day or so, and after that the overall sound becomes chocolatey rich and approachable. It’s extended, although not too extended in the top-end; this is probably a good thing, as earphones at this level can be divided into those that are too rolled off, or those that seem to have a ‘let me scream your treble detail at you’ balance at the price. Double the cost of Sphear and there are earphones that manage to add HF detail without HF brightness, but in its price range, Focal’s Sphear is at something of a Goldilocks spot. As evidence of this, and to continue to flog a dead comedy horse, I listened to Rush’ ‘The Spirit of Radio’ [Permanent Waves, Mercury]; Alex Lifeson’s guitar intro is extremely fresh and dynamic, but Sphear manages to tail off just before Geddy Lee’s vocals go into full screech mode.

It’s extremely dynamic, too. Not ‘effortlessly’ so, in the manner of a good pair of CIEMs or a decent set of loudspeakers, but in a way that makes Gregory Porter’s voice just perfect on ‘No Love Dying’ from his Liquid Spirit album [Blue Note]. His rich tonal range and his vocal articulation come through well on the Sphear, clearly delineated from the slightly close mic’d piano (which can prove claustrophobic on headphones, CIEMs, and earphones). It’s the sound of a vocalist at the top of his game, with all the subtlety and tonal shading that demands. I don’t think you are going to find better from a similarly priced earphone, and to find a loudspeaker that replicated this dynamic contrast with equal skill would buy you a lot of Sphears.

There is a nebulous term that rarely crosses the Rubicon. “It sounds so musical” is one of those terms that pops up in audio equipment reviews but rarely appears in headphonista write-ups. The cynical question is “as opposed to what?” If an earphone isn’t musical, what is it for? But there are degrees of ‘musicality’, from something that sounds tonally correct but musically drab, to the other extreme where everything sounds like a party, but its basic parameters are way off kilter. Focal’s Sphear treads an even path between these two extremes: it’s extremely engaging to listen to in a purely musical manner, and you find yourself lost in the music. However, Sphear doesn’t make that musical connection at the expense of correct objective performance. It just makes music sound enjoyable, whatever music you ultimately enjoy.

 

What I like most about Focal’s Sphear is it’s an ‘honest’ product. It’s keenly priced – if it were twice the price, it would go up against two-way designs with balanced armatures and more far-reaching treble. But rivals with two-way balanced armatures at the price of Sphear just don’t sound as good as Sphear. Bass boost aside, Sphear’s few sins are those of omission rather than commission, and that’s a rare gem at this price, whether from headphones, earphones, or loudspeakers. But most importantly, Sphere sounds enjoyable… and that’s what music is supposed to be about after all.

In a world of high-end audio, where some of the best things in life cost as much as the cost of a car multiplied by the cost of an even bigger car, it’s really, really satisfying to have something to recommend that can be bought and enjoyed by real people. Focal’s Sphear may be hard on spell-checkers, but it’s very easy on the ears. Enjoy!

Technical Specifications

  • Type: one-way universal-fit earphones
  • Drive unit: 10.8mm electrodynamic mylar
  • Microphone: Omnidirectional
  • Frequency response: 20Hz–20kHz
  • THD+N: < 0.3% (50Hz–10kHz, at 1mW)
  • Impedance: 16Ω
  • Sensitivity: 103dB (SPL, 1mW @ 1kHz)
  • Weight: 15g
  • Price: £100

Manufactured by: Focal

URL: www.focal.com

Tel: (+33) 4 77 43 57 00

UK tel: +44(0)845 660 2680

Back to reviews

Read more Focal reviews here

Fostex PX5-HS active standmount loudspeakers

Fostex is one of those brands that we’ve all heard of but rarely see. This is primarily because despite having been around for quite a while (over 60 years in fact) it is best known outside of Japan as a ‘pro’ brand. In its home market, Fostex has a wide range of passive loudspeakers for domestic use: the company started out as a drive unit manufacturer, so it is able to develop its own ideas in this field, something that applies to the PX5-HS.

This two-way bookshelf is an active speaker, meaning that it has built‑in amplification with a crossover that comes before the amps. This is what gives active speakers their advantage, especially since by connecting a dedicated power amp to each drive unit you significantly improve its ability to control that driver. Active is the standard approach in pro audio where Fostex has a strong foothold, and where the need for controlled power is apparently higher even if its quality may not always be the same standard we expect in the home.

The PX5-HS combines a 132mm aramid fibre based mid/bass driver with a laminated urethane film, and a red polyester 25mm dome tweeter. There are twin reflex ports firing forward, a metal back panel with a two-in-one input for XLR and 1/4” jack, plus RCA phono connectors, and a rotary controller that can be used to adjust volume and tonal balance. Switch either function on and you get green lights to aid set up. When these details are combined with the contoured front baffle, the whole thing has clear pro audio overtones, and Fostex has a very similar pro model called simply PX5 that is rather less expensive. The HS version has had its amplifier tuned, the rear panel is designed for better sound, and the controls have been made more intuitive. These changes have resulted in an extra 20kHz of high frequency extension and lower distortion figures.

Under the rear panel there are amplifiers for each driver as well as a crossover of presumably DSP variety, the amps are Class D types and specced to deliver up to 35 Watts to the main driver and 18 Watts to the tweeter. What seems to be missing is an easy means for users to connect their computers or portable devices; at this end of the market, the most likely customer would appear to be the desktop music lover who wants a compact yet capable speaker without the extra hardware of a DAC/preamp in between. But, I guess the keen computer audiophile will have something like that already.

 

When powered up, the PX5-HS illuminates a Fostex logo on the front that remains dark on the back unless you switch in the volume or tone controls for adjustment. Finding the right volume level depends entirely on the connected source, I started by using balanced cables to hook them up to a Music First Baby Reference V2 passive controller and had to turn onboard volume to max. But even then dynamics were limited and the bass lacked control, so they clearly need active drive of some sort. To achieve this I bypassed the Music First and plugged the XLRs directly into a Resolution Audio Cantata DAC/streamer with volume control. This proved rather more successful, and the volume on the speakers had to be curtailed to a point where I could use most of the output on the Cantata. The illumination on the Fostex volume controls makes it easy to set both speakers to the same level, but you wouldn’t want to use them as your main level control.

Now the bass had some power and depth. The drumming on Patricia Barber’s ‘Company’ [Modern Cool, Premonition] had real punch, and the quality of the playing overall and the exact nature of Barber’s urbane lyrics became apparent. I also rather enjoyed an Infected Mushrooms track called ‘Avratz’ [Converting Vegetarians, Yo-Yo], a synth based electronica track with excellent dynamics, bandwidth, and full-scale imaging. The Fostex made a good stab with the first two, but struggled with the track’s full-scale imaging – small speakers are not necessarily limited in this respect, but neither is it a given it seems.

A more purist recording, Doug MacLeod’s Exactly Like This [Reference Recordings] with its acoustic instruments and live sound, reveals that dynamics could be stronger. This is a great recording with very little limiting, but you don’t get its full range here. You do appreciate the band’s cohesiveness, however, and the fact that MacLeod is a natural bluesman. The strengths of the PX5-HS lie in its control of the bass, which is better extended than a passive of similar size and remains tight and tuneful under fire; even heavy bass work outs could not phase it. But good bass is also a lot of fun: playing Yello main man Boris Blank’s ‘Electrified’ (Electrified, Polydor), also electronica, you can feel the kick of the bass ‘drum’ and luxuriate in its power. The low end remains clean so that the voice above it is not smeared or masked in any way. .

What is more challenging is full scale orchestral work where the lower strings are fine, but where the higher ones lack finesse. Combined with the limited dynamics, this means that pieces like Beethoven’s 7th don’t have the power and glory that they deserve. Piano pieces are more successful thanks to the speaker’s reasonable timing skills, and chamber works retain their charm if not the full dynamic envelope.

Out of interest I contrasted the PX5-HS with a Rega Brio-R (£548) amplifier and Q-Acoustics 2010i (£120) speakers, the latter are smaller than the Fostex, but the sound this pair produced was notably more relaxed and expansive. It didn’t have the extension and power in the bass, but it did produce a much more open sound. In an effort to get more from the Fostex I used an ATC CA2 preamplifier and this did prove beneficial; it cleaned up the treble to a useful degree, and although it didn’t extend the bass any further, it seemed to add gravitas to it. Since the preamplifier made the PX5-HS a more enjoyable and rounded speaker, it reveals quite clearly the benefits of partnering electronics to drive long interconnects. I got quite distracted by a fairly dense album, Taylor McFerrin’s Early Riser [Brainfeeder], which combines electronics and keyboards to great effect. As this is the third electronica album to make a positive impression with this speaker, one has to wonder if there is a connection: could this type of monitor be what is used by the producers of such music?

 

If you are looking for a compact solution to use with a computer or in a second room, this Fostex has a lot going for it. The amplifiers aren’t the most powerful around, but this is a low price for an active speaker from an established brand; something has to give. The Fostex is a critically revealing speaker in terms of source quality, which means you will need a decent DAC or preamplifier to get a sweet result. The PX5-HS sounds like it would work with one of the slew of DAC/preamp/headphone amps that are so popular right now, so long as they have a sweet top end and some driving power. And equally important, the Fostex looks good, the combination of pro style baffle with veneered sides and rear is undoubtedly cool.

Technical Specifications

  • Type: Active 2-way, two-driver stand-mount monitor with front-ported bass reflex enclosure
  • Driver complement: One 25mm soft dome tweeter, one 132mm aramid fibre mid-bass driver
  • Rated power: Mid-bass 35 Watts, treble 18 Watts
  • Frequency response: 50Hz – 50kHz
  • Crossover frequency: 2.5kHz
  • Input impedance: XLR 20kOhms, RCA 10kOhm or more, 1/4inch jack 10kOhm or more
  • Dimensions (H×W×D): 280 × 180 × 210mm
  • Weight: 5kg/each
  • Finishes: High grade wood-grain
  • Price: £649

Manufacturer: Fostex International

URL: www.fostexinternational.com

Distributor: SCV Distribution

Tel: +44 (0)3301 222500

URL: www.scvdistribution.co.uk

Back to reviews

Read more Fostex reviews here

The Hi-Fi Show 2015

We may be rivals on the newsstand, but credit where it’s due: Hi-Fi News does ‘put on a good spread’ when it comes to an audio show. Now in its third year at the Beaumont Estate in Old Windsor across the third weekend of October, the show can be a little bewildering in terms of layout (there are five distinct areas across the hotel complex) but is settling into the spaces nicely.

The Hi-Fi Show is a comparative rarity in modern shows in that it concentrates almost solely on traditional two-channel audio. There was not a home theatre system in sight, and only a handful of brands (such as Oppo and Chord) demonstrating in the headphone space. But it didn’t seem to matter, because companies that don’t currently exhibit elsewhere in the UK (Absolute Sounds, Kog Audio, Symmetry) pitch up in Old Windsor.

We decided this year to concentrate on a dozen or so key sounds and new products from some of the best rooms, but there were many others showing good audio.

Audio Alchemy was part of an excellent sounding display using Ayre amplification and Magneplanar loudspeakers in the Symmetry room. The new DDP-1 DAC and PS-5 power supply are keenly priced too.

Computer Audio Design showed its new Mk II version of its popular 1543 DAC, teamed up with Bakoon’s AMP-51 amplifiers and the Swiss Sound Kaos loudspeaker brand, with its Wave 40 loudspeakers and active Subwave D12 bass speaker.

Now that’s not something you see everyday: the Clearaudio Statement turntable, complete with parallel tracking Statement TT1 arm, and Goldfinger Statement cartridge, in an GamuT and IsoTek system in Sound Fowndations large room.

Icon Audio makes find valve amplifiers, but it has turned its hand to something more specialised – making its own tubes. This one is genuinely new; the EL34D, a pure triode power tube designed to drop into any circuit where the popular pentode EL34 normally resides. Expect to pay 300B prices for this innovative design.

 

KEF Audio has not forgotten its mighty Muon. The tall flagship loudspeaker now sports driver technology pulled in from the Blades, and installed Muons can be upgrades on site… for a price!

Kog Audio teamed up with dCS in one room, with the new Rossini set amid a rack full of Entreq grounding. Anyone who pulls out impossible Albert Ayler when asked to ‘play some jazz’ is confident their system sounds good. It did. Elsewhere Kog teamed up with T+A Elektroakustic in an analogue vs. digital seminar.

Absolute Sounds takes the lion’s share of rooms at the show, with almost a whole corridor dedicated to its ranges. This was the first UK public outing of the new Magico S7 standmount loudspeaker, played through Constellation Audio electronics. This had power aplenty.

On show, but not playing, Metronome Technologie presented its first post-CD player; the Music Centre 1. Of course, this streamer/music server also includes a CD drawer for ripping existing discs, too.

Audio Detail and Pre Audio are new names on display in the Ming Da room, both British companies, the first demonstrating a clever new nuvistor-based phono preamp and the second a range of low cost turntables, featuring parallel tracking tonearms and solid granite plinths.

 

Quad’s new Artera component system meets the new Artera Play all-in-one system. These were playing both through Quad’s legendary Electrostatic loudspeakers but also through the upcoming Z4 floorstanders from the brand’s new top Z-Series dynamic loudspeaker range.

Revel’s F35 from its new Concerta2 range was one of the true stars of the show, delivering a sound with all the attributes of loudspeakers in a much higher price category than it should. This 2.5-way elegant white or black tower loudspeaker is set to clean up thanks to its very reasonable price.

With a combination of PS Audio front end and power conditioner, Jeff Rowland amplification (including the latest 625 MK II power amplifier), and DALI Epicon 8 floorstanders, good sound was almost guaranteed. Signature Audio Systems also played an all-PS Audio system with Vandersteen Treo CT loudspeakers.

In one of the few well-lit rooms in the show, Nu Nu Distribution showcased what the best of analogue and digital can do, when an Oracle turntable met TAD electronics and the outstanding Compact Evolution 1 standmounts.

Wilson Audio’s new Sabrina compact floorstanding loudspeaker (hitched to Audio Research electronics and Transparent cables) made one of the best sounds in the show. We’re starting to wonder if it’s possible to do anything less with this loudspeaker.

There were many more rooms and many components making great sounds, at prices from the absolute bargain (ELAC’s new Debut loudspeaker) to systems costing as much as a small house. Sadly, time constraints prevented seeing all of these rooms, but we’ve heard good sounds came out of the Puresound and GT Audio/Tron rooms, and more besides.

Exposing the ‘Good for Classical’ myth

We all do it. We tend to pigeonhole systems (especially transducers like headphones and loudspeakers) as having specific characteristics that ally themselves to a particular genre. We often hear of loudspeakers being ‘good for rock’ or ‘great for classical’, but does this really have any meaning?

Having listened to many loudspeakers that fall into these categories, there is a pejorative element to these statements; it’s as if people who don’t like a genre of music and don’t like a type of loudspeakers tie these two disparate musical elements together into one big ball of dislike. Granted, like any stereotyping exercise, there is a distorted grain of almost truth underlying these statements. In essence, a loudspeaker that accents loudness over accuracy falls into the ‘rock’ category, while a loudspeaker that goes for accuracy at the expense of loudness is considered ‘good for classical’. But these sweeping statements mask a lot.

First, these two elements of a loudspeaker’s performance are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and you can have a loudspeaker that is capable of playing music at high volumes, yet retain its dynamic range and tonal accuracy. This tends to be what marks out high-end loudspeaker designs from cheaper models that need to trade these elements against one another. Second, these sweeping generalisations are fairly insulting to the musical genres they claim to define. ‘Good for classical’ often implies a notion of classical music that is seen as lifeless, anodyne, and undynamic, presumably by those who have never experienced Mahler’s Eighth Symphony live. On the other hand, the ‘good for rock’ slight seems to view rock music as just noise, with no requirement for subtlety and analysis. Both are flawed premises.

However, transducers do have particular characters, but those characteristics do not necessarily or broadly relate to cookie-cutter notions of ‘classical’ or ‘jazz’ or ‘rock’. Interestingly, the easiest way of spotting this is in the headphone world, and this created something of an epiphany for me.

 

In listening to the Chord Electronics Mojo DAC and headphone amp, I naturally tried the device through a range of headphones in a broadly price-matched manner. And it was looking back at the quartet of go-to sub-£500 headphones I used here that I made a striking discovery about my own listening. All four were useful – and used regularly – but their radically different tonal balances and performance made each one useful in entirely different ways. I found I reach for each one of them for different occasions; not when I am in a classical mood or want to play some rock, but throughout different times of the day, or different settings.

For traveling, I use a pair of AKG N60NR noise cancelling headphones because they are small, light, run for ten hours on a single USB charge, and are remarkably good at getting rid of the noises of airports and aircraft. For commuting, I use a pair of Audio Technica ATH-MSR7 closed-back headphones, which are accurate and lightweight, look good, and have interchangeable cables for when I need to use an in-line microphone. For recording I use a pair of Sennheiser HD-25-1 II closed-back headphones because they are exceptionally detailed (especially on voice, which is useful when recording interviews). And for late night use I use the appropriately named NightHawk by AudioQuest because it’s one of the most comfortable headphones I have ever used and its unforced, satisfying sound makes it a natural for relaxing in the evening.

All four headphones all do different things, all equally valid, and all equally right for the task in hand. I could easily change these headphones for dozens of similar models at any price range (Bose in place of AKG, Sennheiser Momentums instead of the Audio Technicas, Sony MDR-7506 instead of the HD-25s, and so on). In fairness, I’d find the NightHawk hardest to swap out because of its long-listening comfort, but nothing’s impossible. But these are the ones I like at the moment.

I don’t find any of these headphones overly ‘good’ at playing a specific genre; they are great all-rounders in their own ways. But their own ways are very different ways. And that’s where the epiphany part comes in. You see, looking at this from an audiophile perspective what I’ve described here (changing transducer with your mood and requirements during the day) is all but impossible because it would require multiple systems. That’s the difference between ‘man cave’ and ‘bat cave’. But the fact is, we do change what we need from our music replay systems over the course of a day: sometimes we need studio-monitor analysis, sometimes we want something far less demanding for background sounds, and sometimes we want something smooth and satisfying, and laid back enough to listen through the evening.

Because we have been unable to do that, we have created the mostly-false notion of systems that are good at one kind of music and not others. As if the system itself had its own tastes. OK so the sign of a good designer is catholic tastes and that should be reflected in the products they design. More importantly, if you design any audio component using an extremely limited selection of music, don’t be surprised if it only plays that musical selection well. But, a good design should transcend the tastes of the designer and work on anything.

We need to stop thinking of ‘good for…’ designs and start thinking of what kind of demands we make on our audio systems. In the headphone space, the choice becomes easy… you buy a few very different sets of headphones to meet all those needs as best as possible. But for a loudspeaker-based audiophile, we’re probably talking compromise, working out how much of your listening is spent in close analysis of the music, how much is spent in a more reflective mood, and how often you will play at whisper or at party levels. Few systems are good at all these things (and the ones that cover most of the bases are usually exotically priced) and once you find your priorities, you might find yourself listening to a lot more music.  

Gigawatt PC-4 EVO power conditioner

Not satisfied with taking over the UK building trade, Poland now has its sights set on your audio system, and Gigawatt, with its range of power products, is in the vanguard. In 1998, Adam Schubert co-founded Power Audio Laboratories in Zgierz, a small town just to the North of Łódź in central Poland. In 2007, Schubert divided the company’s R&D and production facility, creating the Gigawatt brand in the process.

Gigawatt makes power cords, strips, filters, and five conditioners of which the PC-4 EVO is the biggest with 12 Schuko outlets, which is the norm in Europe. The PC-4 EVO is supplied with one of Gigawatt’s high quality mains cables to connect it to the wall, as well as a Schuko plug.

The PC-4 EVO doesn’t use big transformers to isolate its outlets or regenerate the mains. Rather, it has a multi-stage, parallel filtration with each quartet of outlets having its own filtering. The sets of outlets are marked for digital, analogue, and high current products, and the filtering is designed for those load types. The device is capable of supporting a continuous 25A load (70A peak) “if the power line allows”, which is greater than any audio component needs, but nevertheless does mean it can hold a current reserve for impulse loads, effectively working like a big capacitor. The review sample had a DC Offset blocker onboard, which is an optional extra. The front panel display shows incoming voltage level, and where I live, this is quite high; often over 240V and sometimes up to 246V.

I used one of Gigawatt’s chunky stainless braided power cables with a 13A plug on and hooked it up the power supply on a Rega RP10 turntable in an otherwise unconditioned system. The effect was to decrease noise and open up the soundstage, making Joni Mitchell’s voice [Mingus, Asylum] and the layers in the mix clear-cut. The soundstage also became much more solid and three-dimensional, even as it was pretty strong in the first place. Additionally, such an arrangement fleshed out the sound of the musicians, so that the bassist, Jaco Pastorius, seemed ‘behind’ Joni and her guitar.

These positive results suggested that I connected more products to the Gigawatt, starting with my Trilogy 907 phono stage, the next element in the audio chain. This dropped the noise floor further and increased stereo solidity, emphasizing the character of the studio acoustic. The extra clarity produced louder elements, too. It draws attention to the string texture of the acoustic guitar by producing an ability for percussive string sounds to stop and start more quickly, and less ‘smearing’ means faster transients. And that means better timing, and greater involvement, significantly greater.

 

I also tried the Gigawatt on a pair of PMC twotwo.6 active speakers paired with the Velodyne DD+10 subwoofer, both of which have Class D power amps onboard. Here the effect was more dramatic, the conditioner managing to make both sound considerably more refined and much more like class A/B in character. Consequently, it was possible to play music at higher levels and hear a lot more of the musical detail thanks to the reduction in grain. Anyone using Class D amplification should investigate conditioning – you will be surprised at the effect.

I was a little reluctant to try the Gigawatt on my ATC P1 power amp because conditioners that work on high power amplifiers are like gold dust; in fact, the only one I’ve found (Isotek EVO3 Super Titan) costs a bundle and makes most power amps seem compact. But I was glad I did as the result was fascinating and not dissimilar to that achieved with the Class D amps. This time, however, the transition was from A/B to a Class A sound, so much so that I lost many hours to the charms of the resultant effects. Ultimately, connecting the Gigawatt to the ATC P1 power amp gave the sound an ease and finesse; an effect you would have to pay significantly more for than the price of the power amp and conditioner combined. Immensely revealing, beautifully timed, tonally rendered, and totally fluid, the effect was like listening to a powerful valve amplifier with very little in the way of valve character. The music became engrossing, and tracks like the bass heavy ‘Limit To Your Love’ [James Blake, R&S], which often overpowers the room, became pure and radiant.

I also tried the Gigawatt with digital sources, the Melco N1A NAS/transport via an Ayre QB-9DSD, granting the music a vinyl like quality – and I’m not talking about pops and clicks; rather, the music sounded cleaner and more fluid, and could be played at higher levels without discomfort, with brass still blasting out when it should. Connecting the already extremely natural sounding Ayre produced bigger imaging, full-scale soundstages with fine detail, and gave texture to bass lines that had sounded amorphous while making lyrics easier to understand.

Most of my listening with the Gigawatt had been with an easy-to-install Supra Lo-Rad cable. But out of interest, I switched to the Gigawatt cables, and they put me behind the desk in the studio; now the musicians were there to be reached out and touched.

I have reviewed a few conditioners and regenerators over the years and always had positive results, but pound for pound I don’t think any have come close to this. The Schuko factor is a pain, but it might well be something to do with the final result, so it’s a pain with gains in terms of resolution, finesse, and musical coherence. With the Gigawatt, hearing is believing if you want to take your system into another league.

Technical Specifications

  • Type: Multi stage parallel mains power filtering conditioner
  • Power outlets: 12× G-040 silver plated Schuko
  • Maximum output power: 3680 Watts
  • Maximum current load: 16A
  • Absorbed impulse current: 22000A
  • Line voltage: 220–240V/50–60Hz
  • Accessories: 1.5m LC-2HC power cable
  • Dimensions (H×W×D): 181 × 483 × 476mm
  • Weight: 20.5kg
  • Price: €9,100
  • Optional DC blocker: €900

Manufacturer: PA Labs Company

URL: www.gigawatt.eu

UK Distributor: G-Point Audio

Tel: +44(0)1435 86 55 40

URL: gpoint-audio.com

Back to reviews

Read more Gigawatt reviews here

Metrum Acoustics Pavane DAC

Metrum has always done things a bit differently. For a start, all its products are NOS (non oversampling) types, which removes a stage of filtering, and they all have ladder DACs built with discrete components designed rather than an off-the-shelf chip. From these facts alone, you know that Metrum’s founder and designer Cees Ruijtenberg is not the type to follow the crowd: his is a path rather less well trodden, and with the Pavane he has gone further.

The Pavane uses an FPGA-based forward-correction module to overcome the switching noise that undermines the linearity of ladder DACs at low levels. Essentially, it processes both MSB (Most Significant Bits) and the LSB (Least Significant Bits) in the same top half of the converter. This means the Pavane increases the level of the LSBs prior to conversion and sends 12-bits to each DAC module, which means that the lower level or Least Significant Bits have the same signal-to-noise profile as the MSBs. Levels are then corrected in the analogue stage so that you get the full 24-bit depth with maximum linearity. It’s not simple, but it seems to work – and rather well at that.

The Pavane, which incidentally is Metrum’s top model, is a very nicely built piece of audio engineering, and has a machined aluminium front and sides, topped by black glass. I don’t recommend using it to keep your coffee warm, but it has a distinct coffee-table look. Input buttons are arrayed on the front next to an orange light that comes on if no signal is present on a given input. The sockets on the back consist of AES/EBU, USB, optical Toslink, and coaxial on both RCA and BNC connections. I was surprised to find a rather nice but small remote control featuring just the one button in the box that changes the input. The DAC’s analogue outputs are on RCA phono and balanced XLR, the Pavane being a true balanced converter.

Inside the box there are a lot more parts than usually encountered in a DAC, most obviously you have two ladder DAC boards each supplied by its own dedicated mains transformer and power supply. Elsewhere there is a USB receiver, the FPGA chip where the mathematical magic goes on, and a Lundahl transformer for summing the differential output of the DACs prior to the single ended output stage. There is also a third transformer for these elements. All in all it’s a comprehensively engineered piece of kit that eschews the bells and whistles of Bluetooth, network streaming, and volume controls in an attempt to be the best digital to analogue converter that Cees could produce. And given that his more affordable DACs such as the Octave and Hex are pretty stunning, this is a promising start.

 

The only missing bell/whistle that some might begrudge is the ability to convert DSD. How much of an issue this is will depend on your enthusiasm for that format. The Pavane is a fully PCM 24/384 compatible device, and it doesn’t need fashionable formats or upsampling to deliver the goods; it probably achieves its goals by avoiding them.

The Pavane like other Metrum DACs is incredibly revealing of the elements in the music that convince you that there was a living, breathing, and exceptionally talented musician(s) in a studio or on a stage at some point in the past. What makes a product good in this respect is dynamic and temporal linearity; a bit of low level resolution doesn’t hurt either, but this isn’t as important as those linearities in creating the illusion of musical vitality.

The majority of my listening was done via the USB input, which I connected to a Melco N1A digital transport with a short run of Vertere D-Fi USB cable. Previous experience with the Melco has suggested it sounded more real and dynamic via its Ethernet output, but the Pavane proved that the USB output is pretty damn entertaining too. And usefully, the Melco worked happily with it from the off as there’s no need for special drivers as can be the case with some USB DACs. Spinning the very entertaining version of ‘Billie Jean’ by the Civil Wars [Unplugged on VH1, Sensibility Music] I was struck by the atmosphere from the crowd and the easy yet precise timing of the playing. There’s very little in the way of hash or grain to the presentation and a lot in the way of immediacy. I also played Patricia Barber’s ‘Company’ [Modern Cool, Premonition] shortly after spinning the vinyl which is a tough act for any digital product to follow, and while it wasn’t quite as relaxed or architectural in imaging terms it was fast, taut, and the dynamics were probably better. The drumming on ‘Mourning Grace’ from the same album was nothing short of phenomenal.

Playing a variety of pieces I was struck by the variation between them, as the Pavane picked out the nuances as well as the big changes that happened in recording techniques over the years. Arvo Pärt’s Fratres [Naxos] has a huge acoustic and encourages serious replay levels, such is the power and beauty of the piece. Another large-scale piece, ‘Hot Lips’ by the Hot Club of San Francisco [Yerba Buena Bounce, Reference Recordings 24/176.4], can often beguile with its presentation but fail to make a musical connection. The Pavane gives you the scale, but focuses on the playing, and makes it clear that the rhythms are what the original Hot Club were about. The captivation factor of this and other pieces is exponentially higher than usual – with the Pavane, it’s quite a distraction.

I had an Ayre QB-9DSD DAC at the same time and it too was very impressive, but not in the same way. The Ayre sounded incredibly natural, and made instruments and voices seem really real. But the Pavane made you want to play more music largely thanks to a stronger sense of pace. I also tried it with a coaxial source. The Naim UnitiServe has just such an output, which I harnessed to the Metrum with a length of Chord Co Sarum Super ARAY (which helped matters quite significantly). This combo had a more powerful and similarly timely sound that was slightly stronger in the bass, equally enjoyable, and I could have carried on with it had I not wanted to hear a piece that was on the Melco. This proved that the USB connection and/or source was the more engaging of the options available. The UnitiServe, it has to be said, is not really designed to be used this way, and best results will be had via its network output – but it’s certainly no slouch.

 

Hopefully I have given some idea of the Metrum’s abilities to beguile the listener. But it’s worth mentioning that this DAC is also extremely resolute. Few converters can deliver fine detail better at the price, reverb, therefore, is very well served, and this DAC provides excellent depth and scale of image.  This is something that became obvious with James Blake’s ‘The Wilhelm Scream’ [James Blake, R&S], which really came into its own with the Pavane. It normally sounds good, room filling, and impressive, but it often doesn’t reach out and grab you so effectively.

There I am being distracted by emotional communication again! But ultimately that’s what music is, a way of saying things that words cannot hope to convey, and that’s what the goal of all audio equipment should be: to make that message as clear and intelligible as possible. The Metrum Pavane does this significantly better than anything at the price and quite a lot of rather pricier alternatives to boot.

Technical Specifications

  • Type: Non oversampling DAC. Forward (FPGA) corrected, four DACs per channel in differential mode
  • Digital Inputs: One AES/EBU, two Coaxial (BNC, RCA), one Toslink, and one USB.
  • Analogue Outputs: One stereo single-ended (via RCA jacks), one balanced (via XLR connectors)
  • DAC Resolution/Supported Digital Formats: All PCM from 44.1kHz to 384kHz with word lengths up to 24-bit
  • Frequency Response: 1Hz – 20 kHz -2.5 dB, 44.1 kHz sampling. 1Hz – 65 kHz – 3dB, 192 and 384kHz (USB)
  • Distortion (THD): 0.01%
  • Output Voltage: RCA : 2 Volts RMS, XLR:  4 Volts RMS
  • User Interface: Metrum remote control for input selection
  • Dimensions (H×W×D): 85 × 440 × 320mm
  • Weight: 10kg
  • Price: £3,849

Manufactured by: All Engineering

URL: www.metrum-acoustics.nl

Back to reviews

Read more Metrum Acoustics reviews here